[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMcUzvrn75E
[2] https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-coca-cola-posit...
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMcUzvrn75E
[2] https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-coca-cola-posit...
I find it very difficult to agree with that headline. We have lots of proof that putting coke on a covid test makes the test positive. Coca Cola unequivocally causes a positive result.
That's like saying " X vulnerability in our software doesn't actually exist, because if any would-be hackers just followed the rules then they wouldn't be able to exploit the vuln".
I don't think that's what's happening.
Otherwise why are you considering any of their other texts worth reading?
There are plenty of factually correct headlines they could have chosen:
"Putting cola on a covid test causes a false positive"
"Improper use of covid test causes positive result"
etc. You would hope that professional journalists would be capable of writing a clear and correct headline.
It's not a positive result (that implies the person has covid) it's that it damages the test. Like shorting the circuit of an electronic pregnancy test...