When Wiener met Einstein
privatdozent.co
privatdozent.co
Einstein's megatrend forecasting was pretty good.
Many today would think that was perspicacious on Einstein's part.
of Chinese: “It would be a pity if these Chinese supplant all other races. For the likes of us the mere thought is unspeakably dreary.”
and Japanese: “intellectual needs of this nation seem to be weaker than their artistic ones – natural disposition?”
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/jun/12/einsteins-trav...
You can have the opinion that ever person or ethnicity should be treated equally and still dislike cultures and make negative comments about in a private journal.
The idea that non-racist humanitarian should censor their private likes and dislikes into neutral is insane. Being tolerant and cosmopolitan does not mean that you like everyone. It means you tolerate and treat others with respect despite your personal likes and dislikes.
I recommend checking out Stafford Beer's lectures on cybernetics: https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/the-1973-cbc-massey-lectures-...
To learn what things actually felt like, and how people actually saw the world, historians end up building up their pictures from a lot of ordinary artifacts. Writings are fantastic if you can get them, especially candid ones like letters and diary entries. They contain the tiny scraps of information about what people do every day.
Garbage dumps are similarly full of valuable information about what people ate, what they considered important, and what they owned. People think of the junk as gone so they don't filter it. It's truthful in a way that their carefully preserved valuables can never be.
The real work of historians is an enormous amount of drudgery, reading vast amounts of dull material and trying to put together a picture from that. It's not exciting, but to the people who do it, they love the vividness and connection they get.