> I disagree, I think it is. I don't see what right of anyone is infringed by my exercise of speech.
Go threaten to murder someone in front of a police offer and then see if your theory holds.
Go threaten to murder someone in front of a police offer and then see if your theory holds.
The video is her speaking about what limitations on political speech is appropriate for Facebook to impose. Facebook is not a government, Facebook is not in a position to make things like violent threats or incitement legal, even if they wanted to.
This is about what legal speech should be allowed on Facebook.
I watched the video. Frankly, I disagree with your interpretation of her statements.
Free speech is a right that must be balanced against other rights. That's all she says.
If you disagree with that, you believe in a type of free speech absolutism that has never existed in the real world.