A closed browser with limited features made by a unethical company is keeping the web open?
I'll take FOSS chromium variants before I give my data to Apple(and by proxy, the US and Chinese government).
I'll take FOSS chromium variants before I give my data to Apple(and by proxy, the US and Chinese government).
Unless there's a mathematical definition of "ethical" that we can rely on for objective assessment, that's basically everyone and no one based on how you feel any particular day.
There are no angels with the known contenders of "keeping the web open" unless you want to use SerenityOS's web browser that they made themselves.
Unless you are using a very exotic OS that has a browser, I'm not sure how you can begin to defend a chromium variant still derived by an unethical company (Because you have to update that fork) and then attack another unethical company for giving your data to them.