I'm not sure disrupting the ecosystem at the bottom of the pond is an ecologically sound move. Biodiversity is important!
Obviously I understand this is a proof of concept and not the solution to fossil fuels.
Obviously I understand this is a proof of concept and not the solution to fossil fuels.
What are we supposed to take away from this project other than its kind of neat and that methane occurs natural in the environment? We are not about to mining ponds for methane - we already have plenty of it accessible at LFG, waste water treatment facilities, methane from O&G operations.
But BP serves millions of customers. If you normalize by that (ie. pollution divided by customers), my guess is that digging up ponds is more environmentally damaging than buying gas at the gas station.