A PTA Purge of Asians
wsj.com
wsj.com
WRT the new admissions system, all I have to say is that the old admissions system wasn't that great either (the general consensus among my friend group and everyone else I talked to).
For the PTA stuff, I think it's worth noting that TJ has a PTSA (parent - teacher - STUDENT - association), not a PTA. I can't read the article but there's a large push from current TJ parents to completely replace the board with candidates focused on the school instead of pushing politics. You might think that all PTSA stuff is inherently political, but that's not the case. Concerned parents can push for/against admissions reform outside of the PTSA.
- removal of merit-based admissions for Lowell High School
- removal of SAT for admissions to University of California
- restriction of advanced math in the California Math Framework 2021
These will all reduce the link between ability/effort and measures of achievement.
So they will tend to reduce inequality of outcomes, by making outcomes more random. If you see university degrees as a scarce good (e.g. mainly a signalling device), to be allocated evenly among the population, then this may seem like a win.
For those who care about improved academic achievement, or more/better learning, these changes are a step back.
This claim sounds dubious to me. There absolutely must be examples of this, but it's a stretch to turn it into a generalization for all magnet schools. It may be the case for a "No. 1" school such as TJ, but as someone who attended two magnet schools, the process has always been unsurprisingly fair.
This is an extraordinary claim, and you have provided no evidence. Some magnet schools (e.g. Lowell in San Francisco) used to have purely merit-based admissions (you must exceed X on a test). Do you think this has 'nothing to do with student intelligence or ability'?