Choices for Greece, All of Them Daunting
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
"If it left the euro zone, Greece could reap the substantial benefits of a currency depreciation, but doing so would also set off huge runs on banks. And the country has no alternative paper currency ready for use."
This is the only part of the article that considers not repaying debts.
Decades of austerity measures = poor for the rest of your life.
I know which sounds more sensible to me.
Now which option looks more appealing?
Option two, "Eurobonds" will be issued. This will allow Germany to lend money for Greece at a very low interest. (costs Germany a lot of money as their national interest will be increased, last resort)
Option three, some of the debt will be dropped and reissued as longer ten year loans releasing the choke hold. Paul Achleitner from allianz hinted.
Option four, EFSF will buy Greek bonds.
Unemployment rates went down in Greece from 16,2% to 15,8% last month. Which hints their economy is growing a bit. There's talk of a banking tax, which let banks pay a small % to help build a buffer for these situations. I'm personally more worried about the United States then the euro zone.
Careful: The implication "unemployment rate goes down => economy is growing" is not true in general.
The rate of unemployment is always defined relative to the active part of the population, where active means either employed or looking for work.
In extreme downturns, as Greece has experienced, the participation rate naturally drops because people become disillusioned. This can have the bizarre effect that the unemployment rate drops even though the total number of jobs actually decreases. So the absolute number (and then also the rate) of unemployed decreases not because the unemployed become employed, but rather because they become economically inactive (i.e., they give up).
I am not sure if this is what is happening in Greece, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was. The interfaces of most national statistics institutions are really horrible, so I haven't looked at the numbers.
I assume you got those numbers out of some newspaper or similar, and I just wanted to point out that especially in extreme economic circumstances, reporting only the unemployment rate is irresponsible - but unfortunately, that's what most media is.
Final thought: Comparing the United States to the Eurozone is to misunderstand the nature of the beasts. Both have a common currency, but the US has a significant central monetary sovereign. The Eurozone has no monetary sovereign. The differences this implies are enormous.
The problem with changing currency is that its impossible to pull off without having bank runs that would make the Great Depression look like a bad ATM line. Changing a country's currency takes a lot of preparation. New bills have to be printed. New coins have to be minted. The currency has to be distributed to banks. Exchange rates between the new and old currencies have to be set. Do you really think that this can be done in secret?
No, if Greece decided to go back to the drachma, there would be a massive financial panic as everyone with a Greek bank account tried to pull their Euros out and move them overseas. The civil unrest that would cause would make the current protests look like a small crowd of rowdy teenagers.
Greece must exit the Euro to avoid prolonged Great Depression-style unemployment.
So this becomes a short vs. medium term tradeoff. Introducing a new currency will most likely be chaotic, but in the medium term it allows Greece the flexibility to restart the internal economy. Without introducing a new currency, the short term chaos can be avoided at the cost of a very prolonged downturn that is destructive for the country's prospects and may lead to political chaos in the medium-to-long term.