Yet, in the comments, people are explaining Phil’s view of the job to Phil, because Phil is apparently not an “actual technical security expert.” … what?
People like PV build and lead very competent security programs because they see nuance, and focus on biz value. Sec engs, aka “actual technical security experts” who burn out or their companies burn out on them usually don’t.
Edit: I just double checked his resume, forgot to add board if h1, BISO/CISO of a few other banks, former SWE, so on. Security culture is it’s own worst enemy sometimes when evaluating content like this.