These days seems like the press has sold out and seems like they are in someone’s pocket…
>These days seems like the press has sold out and seems like they are in someone’s pocket…
We do not want to compensate journalists, and there seems to be quite some risk in doing investigative journalism in China, so I would not expect someone to donate their life as the risk reward ratio is out of whack.
We barely have the choice to compensate journalists. For them to do their jobs effectively, they need to group together. But the people who control the groupings of journalists take active steps to cultivate a feeling of distrust and hostility between the would-be compensators and the controllers of the groups. Are there any news websites that make you feel better and more informed after you've visited them? It always seems like you should feel grateful they haven't started tracking you, got you an expensive and hard to cancel subscription and like your life will be desperately uncertain if you decide to go make a cup of coffee.
It's almost impossible to spend nothing but a couple of dollars and some attention in exchange for quality journalism like it was just a few years ago.
There is one party who controls the interaction between journalists and the public, and prior to casting aspersions on the general public you need to consider their actions.
In the face of declining ad revenue media organizations are much more keen on predictable revenue streams.