To be quite honest: I'm not comfortable with my current education level regarding the vaccine considering the pretty aggressive censorship everyone has been doing with information on it.
What is censorship in this case? Not spreading debunked or poorly-supported claims?
True censorship would've been something like keeping hush the rare blood-clotting incidents with J&J. But there are so many studies across so many countries that are freely available to read and be informed by.
Even the claims of twitter/other social media censoring don't hold water for me. Extraordinary claims should require extraordinary proof imo
But the autonomy applies to the decision process, and not the specific choice. Choosing the contrary conclusion is just as non-autonomous.