Hacker News Reader

Comment by frankbreetz | Hacker News Reader

What is the alternative? Sometimes you must close a road or sidewalk in order to perform maintenance. This is an out of touch stance.

View on HN

The alternative, the business pays a fee per day for lane and sidewalk closures. I guarantee they will close the lanes and sidewalks less often and for shorter durations.

I don't know how it is where you live, but that's the way it works here. You pay a daily fee.

Because the fee isn't paid to them they don't notice or care.

Much of the "solutions" provided for apparent existing problems already exist. Some kind of analogy to the Dunning-Kreuger effect is going on - any problem I don't understand is simple.

This is already how it works. Also, in the process of applying for a permit, the city will make sure your construction plan is reasonable and you're doing everything you can to minimize impact to the public. I think anywhere in the world with a functioning local government will be similar.

> anywhere in the world with a functioning local government will be similar.

Boston does not have a functioning local government. A developer in my old neighborhood blocked a sidewalk for three years without a permit. Public works issued them one $50 fine. The same developer also abandoned the site in an effort to pressure the zoning board to allow them to add floors to their plan.

Most places in the US do not have functioning governments, to be fair, including at the national level.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com