I still don't understand how there's so much armchair quarterbacking around legality of Copilot, from people with zero legal skills and just anti-big-tech hot-takes.
I still don't understand how there's so much armchair quarterbacking around legality of Copilot, from people with zero legal skills and just anti-big-tech hot-takes.
Because Microsoft's legal department (and the company itself) has a spotless reputation for ethical and legal compliance.
Regardless, if you’d rather discuss morals - I don’t believe what they’ve done is immoral or wrong either. I use Linux, and write FOSS code and contribute to the FOSS community quite regularly.
Devs can ignore legal for a very short time, but the moment you have a team working on it, you need legal approval to continue. And if there's going to be a public launch, you have an entire legal, data, and privacy team to vet it first.
Put simply, there is no universe wherein MS's legal team hasn't cleared Copilot before launch, and I'm disappointed HN groupthink believes otherwise.
I’m saying FAANG+MS definitely have this process, you can ask any employee how it works there.
There is 0% chance that this wasn't run past their legal team.