U.S. Navy Laser Creates Plasma ‘UFOs’
forbes.com
forbes.com
This is a good starting point [0]. The page also links to several later updates.
[0] https://www.otherhand.org/home-page/area-51-and-other-strang...
Or reduce it in size and print it on demand into the outer layers of a traditional fusion reactor plasma-donut, to dampen minor fluctuations, without constantly modifying the underlying superconducting coils.
So cool this actually works.
What you are hoping for is a return to WW1/2 levels of violence. No thanks.
More like "world anxiety."
The Laser Developed Atmospheric Lens (LDAL): BAE Systems futurist Professor Nick Colosimo explains https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlBX3lDIlvw
BAE Systems future technologies: The Laser Developed Atmospheric Lens https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhWBAFAGwzE
You shine a laser beam in some direction in order to create an image/flashbang/whatever twenty meters away. Why does it ionize the air twenty meters away but not ten meters away (along the same ray from the laser to the projection)?
[0] https://www.otherhand.org/home-page/area-51-and-other-strang...
The fact that the particles have mass and decelerate is what produces the sharp drop in velocity: the slower it goes the more it slows down per unit of time or of distance traveled. Like a bullet travelling through water. So you get that nice sharp asymptote in the position-vs-time graph.
I don't think that webpage is applicable to light or other photon beams. Photons can't slow down unless they encounter a change of medium -- but that's basically projecting onto a physical "screen"... the laser operator can't influence the depth position of the screen. But thanks for the link, it's the first time I've seen a "3D projection technology" that had a coherent answer to the depth-control question. Maybe the Navy is using massive-particle beams instead of lasers and the Forbes journalist just doesn't know the difference. Or maybe it's deliberate disinformation, like how fusion weapons were named "hydrogen" bombs.
[0] https://www.google.com/amp/s/techcrunch.com/2011/11/15/aeria...
Or maybe it is just an energy distance thing. Not sure what happened to this company.
Aerial Burton 3D is the name
Except the fact that lots of things can move that quickly, like an atmospheric plasma phenomenon. When they say “actively jammed his radar,” all they are saying is that the object emitted a scattered signal of radar light which lots of things could do, including things that don’t have anything to do with sentient life.
The fact that "major news outlets have reported on this" makes even more "credible". When we gonna see people kidnapped by aliens on TV?