Jeff Bezos Steps Down as Amazon’s CEO After 27 Years
finance.yahoo.com
finance.yahoo.com
Jeff's concept of the API mandate was such small and pivotal moment in technology, I may put it up there with Edison's lightbulb or James Watt's addition of the condenser to the steam engine.
There is a lot left if Bezos' career. There is no telling what he will do next or what his final legacy will be. But regardless, Amazon is quite a thing. It's not the biggest or wealthiest corporation on the planet, but it is far and away the most important right now.
It's quite a thing he made. It will be interesting to see what Amazon does without him.
(But again, I may have said the same thing about the Gates/Balmer era of Microsoft, but I think Microsoft has arguably done better since).
The Gates era produced some of the finest software Microsoft ever made, Windows 2000, Visual Studio and Office 2000. They had a real focus on developers, and developer support (remember when MSDN didn't suck?).
In spite of Balmer jumping up and down on stage yelling "Developers!!", he had no idea how to build a software company and subsequently nearly drove it into the ground.
Although, to give Ballmer some credit, he inherited a lot of structural problems in the business, and I merged their eras because it was never very clear when Gates actually let go of all of the reigns.
If you actually know how to support developers you don't need to jump up and down on stage screaming about it.
I have often disliked the practices of Microsoft, and don't think creating benevolent billionaires is the best way to solve the world's problems, but I have to credit the fact that Bill Gates has actually tried to change the world for the better through the Gates foundation.
In comparison, Jeff Bezos's aspiration to travel into space seems to me mawkish (to use the same word as Russell Brand https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhMY23kgcKQ).
Jeff Bezos says that space "changes your relationship with this planet, this humanity, it's one earth". It seems to me completely out-of-touch with the reputation of Amazon.
5 years of lost tech advancement means nothing to history.
Monsanto.
For starters.
How about this? "Gates opposed waiving some provisions of the World Trade Organization’s Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, or TRIPS. A waiver would allow member nations to stop enforcing a set of COVID-19-related patents for the duration of the pandemic so that low- and middle-income countries can produce or import generic versions of vaccines.
Gates met with U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai last week to make the case for protecting these patents..."
https://www.devex.com/news/gates-foundation-reverses-course-...
https://www.salon.com/2021/04/26/bill-gates-says-no-to-shari...
He would rather poor people die than let IP rules be weakened, even for a a little while.
The reason you don't hear about it is because he is one of the wealthiest men in the world and he has a lot of power/influence. All that money buys really good PR.
I mean the guy strengthened his friendship with Jeffry Epstein AFTER he was released from jail for being convicted of procuring a child for prostitution.
This is an example of the intellectual honesty that is presented in this sort of source:
> Who knows what this corporate-speak really means, but in all probability it heralds the big time introduction of GM soya in southern Africa.
And their smokin gun? An insignificant investment of 20M dollars from the Gates Foundation on Cargill.
If you really intend to sell your conspiracy theories as something somewhat credible, you should start by addressing the sources you pick to base your wild claims on.
How much is Bill Gates actually involved? Why is Monsanto so bad? What is the stranglehold? Are Africans not allowed their own agency here?
also:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsanto#Legal_affairs
There's so much! Enjoy the read.
If you have neither of that to present and feel compelled to hand-waive your way out of answering simple questions them that should be enough to make you reconsider what you are really doing and what problems you need to address.
Jeff's concept of all of his workers being lazy has been pivotal in the concept of hiring to fire.
Jeff lead the way in his idea of firing people with cancer.
He lead in having the most people cry at their desk.
His concept of making people wear diapers instead of letting them go to the bathroom.
Don't get me wrong. I want my cheap stuff and to some degree they are the only game in town.
I do think that Amazon changed how we shop in a large way.
I'm still holding out for a 'big reveal' on his vision for the 2nd half of his career - hopefully more than just an egotistical space race. The world is depending on him given his outsized influence and wealth.
Ask anyone doing carpet cleaning or another home based trade. Where do you think they pee and poo? They dont do it in the clients home. They go in a bottle or into a bucket in the back of their van.
And for the record, if you’re doing a job in my house, you can use my toilet. Whatever social stigmas there are around contractors and cleaners using the house toilet - those are the same classist and toxic forces that let people justify dehumanizing work.
Any time I have contractors working at my house, they use my bathroom like a human being.
What dystopian hellhole are you advocating for here?
Things seem to be just getting worse and worse. When does it get better, huh? I'm still waiting.
I think history shows that being passive seldom gives you any rewards, when looking at people grouped by ethnicity, class, gender, etc. No matter what you think of the worker's movements, they did produce unions that did bring huge benefits like vacation, paid parental leave, etc. Especially in Europe. This is an example of being "active" as a group towards another group, and then reaping some benefits from that.
I think we have seen a huge decline in activity from workers as a group, and an equal push of activity from big companies. Couple that with hugely increased globalization etc, and you soon get large factories where people piss in jugs while hoping to not get caught emptying their bladder without registering for taking a break, and it is going to get worse until some group actively decides to do something about this.
Bernie Sanders had a great response in a town forum where the panelist was trying to get him to acknowledge how grateful we should be for billionaires and their helping hand during the pandemic. What he said was, he thinks it is great that they (billionaires) are doing charity work, but the fact is, for a nation as rich as the United States, being thankful for billionaire hand outs is ridiculous.
We (developed nations) honestly shouldn't be in a situation where we rely on billionaires to prosper and be excited about it.
Maybe it brings power and control, maybe it doesn’t. The two are not intrinsically linked.
There are people far more poor, and far more powerful than me in our current system.
Maybe these people have more "social capital" than you, but that doesn't go far if you can't survive.
The desperation economy is designed to keep a lot of monkeys dancing for peanuts.
Take a step back here. Why do you think a government ends up spending insane amounts of the budget on the military? Where do you think that money goes?
What you're seeing is the result of giant capitalist corporations producing weapons, logistics, etc. that have enough power to parasitize the government.
You can argue that it's a failure of government that it is able to be captured, or a failure of capitalism (or corporatism) that it does so. I don't find either argument particularly illuminating.
I think a better way to look at it is that we live in a capitalism+democratic system and that combined system clearly has some significant structural flaws. If we don't look at our government and private sector systems holistically and fix those flaws relatively soon, we won't have to, because they will have made the world uninhabitable for most humans.
Honestly? To maintain the value of our currency. The threat of Countries (looking at you Saudi Arabia) bailing on the so called "petro dollar" have caused our leaders to make terrible choices (like bombing the hell out of Yemen for decades). We are so scared of what would happen to our currency if the petro dollar went away we are basically a mercenary force to foreign countries.
> What you're seeing is the result of giant capitalist corporations producing weapons, logistics, etc. that have enough power to parasitize the government.
This is the symptom, not the disease. The problem isn't "giant capitalists" are producing weapons, it is that a market even exits for them.
>I think a better way to look at it is that we live in a capitalism+democratic system and that combined system clearly has some significant structural flaws. If we don't look at our government and private sector systems holistically and fix those flaws relatively soon, we won't have to, because they will have made the world uninhabitable for most humans.
I agree wit you on this.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/nymag.com/intelligencer/amp/201...
I think a better way to look at it is that we live in a capitalism+democratic system and that combined system clearly has some significant structural flaws. If we don't look at our government and private sector systems holistically and fix those flaws relatively soon, we won't have to, because they will have made the world uninhabitable for most humans
I couldn't agree with more and as a libertarian leaning centrist I wish I could blast this into every voter's mind.
As long as we have a corporate capture of the government, increased intervention and micromanagement of private markets will only exacerbate the problem (via regulatory capture, too big to fail, command economy, ect). There is no workable alternative to capitalism, but there is clear alternative to corrupt government.
Every problem with the system has a simple market solution which could be implemented with a government less susceptible to corporate influence.
Military budget too large > pass lower spending bills
Healthcare too expensive > allow Medicare to set prices based on health benefit.
Climate change > require goods & corporations to include costs of carbon remediation
As long as corporations exist, they will have incentives misaligned with the general public. Aligning corporate interest with that of society is impossible, so the only solution is to firewall government
If you're admitting critique of Amazon, you're admitting critique of Jeff Bezos. He could try to make it a great company for all stakeholders, instead we got abnoxious near monopoly that pushed out smaller retailers and lowered standards in all kinds of ways. Employees get shitty working conditions laced with work-harder propaganda, buyers have to use a shitty website with real products mixed with shitty fake products with faked reviews.