Hacker News Reader

Nothing is closed-source to the courts.

It may be possible to use closed source code during training and delete it, leaving just a black box model that is hard to prove was derived from that closed source code.

What's the point? Linux is already open under GPL 2.

He mentioned that the Linux-like kernel will be closed source which violates GPL

Does it, if code was written by a bot that trained on Linux kernel?

You know, that's precisely what the topic here is about.

Probably. Copyright applies to derivative works.

You get to make changes without having to respect the GPL and thus no longer obligated to provide those changes to your end users, as you have effectively laundered the kernel source code by passing it through an "AI" and get to relicense the end result.

my linux-like kernel will be MIT license though

Oh, you're so witty, have you heard of content hashing?