Obviously a program that is able to write actual great code reliably would be spectacular, but we aren't there yet, I don't think Copilot presently is able to make me meaningfully more productive.
Obviously a program that is able to write actual great code reliably would be spectacular, but we aren't there yet, I don't think Copilot presently is able to make me meaningfully more productive.
At the end of the day I think it boils down to this simple fact: you can't imperatively codify what makes the face of a person beautiful for you because that's too complicated, similarly you can't codify what makes for beautiful code to your eyes, it's something that must be learned from examples.
I don't doubt Copilot is also quite a problem to solve, most likely indeed harder, though in that case at least there's an abundance of training data.
I agree that something like that would be much easier to make in theory, hence why I'm suggesting it since maybe it could be made ~perfectly, which Codepilot isn't (we haven't unlocked AGI yet).