interesting that when you click the compare features, it claims 100% open source, but they dont seem to have any links to the source anywhere.
false claims like this will ensure I never use or recommend this product
Here is the section from the Wiki.js license (again, not ours):
d) Convey the object code by offering access from a designated place (gratis or for a charge), and offer equivalent access to the Corresponding Source in the same way through the same place at no further charge.
In this case, we are offering access to the object code for a charge and anyone who licenses it can have the corresponding source code at no additional charge. This is straight-up AGPL.
Wiki.js is the only product we offer with AGPL source and the only one licensed this way. Our other products are Blue Oak which is entirely permissive. We offer those products for self-installation from GitHub repos with the full source.
how is that not misleading?
if YOUR license is not open source, you need to remove this claim from your website.