Many people don’t want to work unless it’s from home
vox.com
vox.com
People who find driving intensely stressful can be accommodated. People who might not feel comfortable being themselves in physical corporate spaces (e.g. those whose appearance/ethnicity gets remarked on, or people who feel the need to code switch around co-workers) can be accommodated. People who want to maximize time near their loved ones can be accommodated. People on the autism spectrum can be accommodated. Germophobes, agoraphobes, and those who are just socially anxious can be accomodated. People with disabilities can be accommodated.
And if all of these people have proven to do effective work remotely, are we really doing a healthy thing for society in demanding their physical presence?
Fast forward to 2020--nearly everyone has moved to 100% remote. It's hard to tell who is local vs not anymore. There are _some_ local events, but they usually coincide with flying folks in. I'd say it's much more inclusive as it puts us all on a more level playing field.
Oh, the frustration of stealthily making your way to the hallway only to get stopped by a chatty coworker as your bowels begin to churn. The ticking of the clock as the sweat drips down your face. The movement of your coworker’s lips in slow motion as small talk pours out of their mouth while everyone else sneaks off to fill the bathrooms up.
Nah, can’t say I miss that part very much.
[0] https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/essential-job-functi...
Is it common to _require_ them?
It’s taken years to work out what are generally positive/negative signs in-person and now that’s all out the window.
1. Most companies only hire within a small physical distance of their office(s);
2. Of those that hire remote workers, most will only hire them if they are physically located in the US, or with luck Canada / Mexico;
3. Of those that hire globally, most will only hire through an agency, so there is some middleman taking a sizable chunk out of salary.
Bonus: When you finally find a company that hires remotely, hires internally, and hires globally... they will only offer what they think is the minimum needed in your country.
So... no thanks! I'll keep contracting independently for now. I'm not opposed to working for a company, but until US companies start recruiting reasonably, they are leaving out the majority of people- even the majority of English speakers if that is a requirement.
Have seen a lot advertising in Australia recently for remote workers. Presumably because of the cultural fit and there is still a bit of time zone overlap.
Commute halfway to work, turn around, and ride home.
I no longer ride my bike to work; but, when I did, on the days I worked from home, I had my "commute to nowhere" every morning. (I admit that if the weather was nasty, I'd skip it.)
Anything else is a potential waste of a lot of our time.
Make it a point to also ask the hiring manager or someone on the team what remote means. Sometimes recruiters are not on the same page as the team or the rest of the company, and some companies have "unique" definitions of remote work.
That said, one thing I haven't seen mention of in favor of on-site work is regarding skills development. I've personally benefitted greatly from deep team integration early in my career, learning much of the practice of software engineering and applied research. It's easy to imagine that not happening as well or at all if I had been pure remote straight out of college. I've also worked on teams that included less skilled/experienced members that have had a very frustrating work experience due to for some reason having missed out on that learning by deep integration and osmosis.
Might ask for 20, 25 grand more if I have to go back to the office.
Here's a source you can use for hard numbers[1].
Commutes are responsible for a 9.91% drop in wages. They're also responsible for an average of nearly 10 entire days of driving a year, or 30 full 8-hr work days of driving each year.
I go for a walk before and after working (at home) to bookmark my day. It's also healthy :)
I know a significant number of young women here who can speak English, have a computer, and decent home office, and are earning $1k-$2k/month for run-of-the-mill marketing jobs full-time for American companies.
(By contrast the salary for a Doctor here is about $1.5k)
I know young men who basically replicated entire American departments, in Ukraine.
You Americans should really be weary about this widespread move to remote.
The other possibility is that if remote work is allowed, but working on prem is preferred, then workers who agree to work on prem will be able to out compete the remote workers for positions anyway which means little practical improvement for those wanting to work remotely.