I won't argue with you too much on tone, and will try to keep it a bit more technically grounded next time. The NEC 2017 rapid shutdown changes from NEC 2014 (basically, per panel to less than 80V, as opposed to array boundary shutdown) significantly increase cost and complexity in an array, and add a
lot more failure points on the roof. You can now no longer do a roof mount system on a totally unshaded roof without the per-panel equipment, and that's a very real cost increase for systems.
For a while, if you had a rooftop system and NEC 2017, there was no way to use the Sunny Boy backup outlets - because they require solar power, and after a rapid shutdown event (which is indistinguishable from a grid failure, from the point of view of the inverter), there was no power left to bring anything online.
However, there's a tech note floating around that explains how to do it: https://www.stellavolta.com/blog/technical-note-sunny-boy-us...
You can provide voltage to the controllers in the inverter externally, though, and have it "open up" the Tigo modules (which handle shutdown among other things) so it can run standalone with the grid down and power the backup outlet.
For a rooftop solution, I think this is probably the sweet spot at the moment, and having done the math on it a while ago, the cost to do Sunny Boy and Tigo optimizers is within a rounding error of the cost of doing the same thing with Enphase microinverters. So, despite having a good bit more hardware, the cost is magically the same. Whatever claims Enphase is making about their cost effectiveness doesn't seem to match the reality, where I can adjust panel capacity vs inverter capacity to fit the system requirements (vs microinverters, which only come in one or two capacities, and if you want something else, well, lol, nobody else left in business so deal with it).
I'm actually a far bigger fan of ground mount solar (which is what I've built for my home - 15.9kW of panel, currently producing about 90kWh/day and producing from sunrise to sunset because most of the panels are east-west facing), and am working with some other people locally to figure out some ways to stamp out "homeowner installed" ground mount arrays that are a basic set of plans and equipment lists. Doing that, we can do solar for $1.25/W or less, which is a huge, huge savings over standard residential solar, which is $2.50/W or more (Tesla claims to come in lower, but won't touch anything the slightest bit complex and it's unclear if they're actually profitable doing that or just trying to drive other companies out of business with venture capital).
None of this makes me particularly popular with the local solar installers, because I'm far, far more interested in getting cheap solar built out than ensuring the installers have their tidy profits and commissions. I got a couple quotes a few years ago around $4/W for a basic roof mount system, and that's just disgusting.