IIRC, it was mainly banned because "there is consensus that The Grayzone publishes false or fabricated information" (as the summary states). I believe this was one of the examples: https://www.thedailybeast.com/in-nicaragua-torture-is-used-t... (Grayzone presenting the forced confession of an anti-regime activist as legitimate). Here's another about Max Blumenthal himself fabricating a quote: https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/12/di.... There were questions about its editorial oversight, but those were secondary. Basically it's one of those sites, like RT, that has a political position and has little problem with pushing disinformation to support it.
I think any news agency is like this.
The strength of journalist freedom is that all such different news agencies can present their facts.
> disinformation
I am pretty sure everyone believed their information and don't want to verify them thoroughly. I mean, even US government does want to verify the so-called evidences of WMD in Iraq...
The political position of the grayzone is anti-imperialist which is an insightful way to view the US and its actions in central and south america for the past few decades. I am having trouble following the Nicaragua article as it is heavy on details. I know that one of the grayzone reporters actually lives in Nicaragua so I value their reporting more than a journalist based somewhere else.
And huge thanks to Russia for funding some media critical of the US. Radio Sputnik has some great shows like By Any Means Necessary.
By Any Means Necessary: https://www.spreaker.com/show/1843722/episodes/feed
These articles might be more up your alley:
https://www.dsausa.org/democratic-left/no-to-chinese-authori...
https://newpol.org/against-the-grayzone-slanders/
https://newpol.org/on-gutter-journalism-and-purported-anti-i...
Edit: here's another good (but dead) sibling comment https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27648773.
seppin, if you're reading this, you're shadowbanned and very few people will be able to read your stuff.