Sounded like it was possibly an interesting topic but as happens far too often these days, the desire to have unique visual design ended up being an assault on the eyes. I'm very bearish on this type of (hideous) style above substance.
Interesting piece! Thanks for sharing.
Nitpick if you are the OP: while I appreciate the distinctive style, the font really made it hard for me to read
I immediately reach for the "read clearly" button in firefox but it doesn't always appear and this time it didn't.
Funnily enough I clicked the chevron and there are some settings. It's a tiddly wiki. I tried changing the font but didn't succeed at first try so I gave up.
I actually think the value of the live conversation is lost and most of these would be better as pod casts. They aren’t very shareable, since they synchronous. Editing would help most of the ones I’ve listened to.
Terrible font and nonsensical rambling.
Many Twitter users with a high follower count have turned off replies from people they don’t follow. So it’s basically just an announcement platform for perceived genius.
Bear or bare?
Quite sure it is supposed to be bear, as in bull vs bear.
It is bear. As in bull vs bear. The author thinks social audio will do poorly, hence he is "bearish" on the use case.