Harmful social behaviors are the toughest to shift
blog.pnas.org
blog.pnas.org
They had 276 people play 2 rounds of a video game where bots helped, harmed, or didn’t interact with the player. Only players who were first harmed by bots continued to exhibit “harming” (a mechanic that removes players from the game) into round 2 even when bots stopped doing anything.
Based on this super narrow definition I would hesitate to say this says anything on a societal scale.
This is a no zap safe-space, unless it's a consensual thing.
I can’t imagine why, but at least it does sound consensual.
And of course instead of batteries you could have long cords and plug your zappers in.
Ok, life does sound like consensual fun for you and your buddies.
Something >90% of COVID transmission happens in indoor settings. They're all wearing masks. I think it is unreasonable to describe that as an "actively harmful" social norm, there are already a lot of controls here against coronavirus spread.
In May 2020 it was totally unclear that we were about to, having never developed a vaccine for coronaviruses in humans before, rush out vaccines at a speed that leaves prior records in the dust.
There are enormous benefits to forming strong social bonds. It is night and day. I think whoever captioned that picture is over-weighting the risks of disease against the other risks we face in life.