Why does the HN headline say “landfill” while the original article says “artificial land”?
To me “landfill” implies trash/refuse disposal and “artificial land” implies infill of formerly wet/low areas. Not nearly all of the latter is the former.
To me “landfill” implies trash/refuse disposal and “artificial land” implies infill of formerly wet/low areas. Not nearly all of the latter is the former.
In this case, I feel building on wetlands is the bigger problem.
This literal trash foundation is unfortunately how big parts of numerous American cities have been built.
“At worst, they are made by throwing some dirt over the top of a pile of garbage, and building more city on top of it”
For example this link redirects back to the OP's URL
https://theweek.com/trump/murder/1001964/miami
I always find CMSs lazy hacks for a clean URL fascinating.
I personally put the number as close to the domain as I can get away with, because the farther away it is, the more likely it is to be truncated, and I don't care how nice the partial URL looks, if it's missing the number, I can't get your content. And no, I'm not building it for just slugs no numbers, because I've seen what happens to those.
There was some poor site owner seeking assistance on the Let's Encrypt community site because (of course) even though they swear they haven't changed anything now mysteriously Let's Encrypt stopped working and so it must be a bug in Let's Encrypt.
They're using http-01, so the magic files need to be exposed from a /.well-known/ directory and others have got them to try a test file named "test". When you ask for the test file though, what you get is a 30x redirect to some unrelated blog post.
Well, it looks unrelated at first, and then what I realise is, that post is about Testimonials. Sure enough when I ask for a file named 'chris' instead I get redirected to a blog post about Christmas...
I don't think that user ever figured out what their problem actually was, it's a little frustrating but you have to let them go do their thing.