>Why Microsoft is calling Windows 10 'the last version of Windows'
https://www.theverge.com/2015/5/7/8568473/windows-10-last-ve...
There you see again what Microsoft's statements are worth.
There you see again what Microsoft's statements are worth.
I’m not sure why this is that problematic?
> *Look for PCs that indicate they are eligible for the free upgrade, or you can check with your retailer for more information.
Are they, though?
1 - No licensed W10
2 - Too old PC - can't work with W11
3 - No MS account or internet connection (as this is a requirement for upgrading)
But Microsoft did say that Windows 10 was going to be theast version of Windows, with incremental updates thereafter; I don't see why they need to change that to accommodate what appears to be little more than an unwanted UI refresh with more crappy AI-driven news feeds that nobody wants. From everything I've seen, Windows 11 looks like it's very much an incremental update over the Windows 10 of today.
So why not have a Windows 10 feature update? What is the point of this?
> Windows 11 brings you closer to the news and information you care about faster with Widgets – a new personalized feed powered by AI
Also, I can already have the weather as a tile in my start menu if I wanted (why, tho?).
It's obviously a lot more complex than that.
For example, they are dropping 32-bit support. You can't release an update that does something like that.
Is there anything more of substance though?
Also, this TPM requirement seems like something they shouldn't be doing - it's not a benefit for end users to have less choice. I mean, if I don't want to use a TPM, then why should I have to?