Objectively, none of this is probably true (except the last).
Every moral standard is arbitrary if you don't recognize the distinctions being made.
This is not a gotcha, I'm genuinely curious.
It is interesting to watch dogs being treated like humans, almost like children and that sense of care does not extend to very human neighbours.
I don't get it. Probably because its a cultural thing. Anecdotally, where I am from a dog is a dog and will never get more attention than a person. It's not allowed in the house because that's where people live and if you feel lonely you call up a friend or sibling - not cuddle a dog.
One might get the impression that some cultures place more value in a dog than a person, which is bizzare since it is just an animal.
I think you've summed up ,quite succintly, my suspicions about western hegemony. The west is like the Empire in Asimovs Foundation trilogy. Wveryone is too busy looking at their phones to realise everything around them is crumbling.
Unconditional love is valuable for humans.
Wolves have also a huge positive impact in our economy. If we exclude the humans, the wolf is the animal that had saved more human lives in the history, so is in a special category. Dogs and wolves belong to the same species.
Would you mind elaborating on this point? In what way has the wolf saved uncountable human lives? I've only ever seen it portrayed as a human and livestock predator.
EDIT: I've been reading up on the matter. Historically, the wolf has been associated with disease control, as they tend to remove the weakest, sickest members of a given herd from the genetic pool.