I really don't know how to say this without using a !%^&* word.

Anybody tried to view the data on a small netbook screen? or on an older 1024x768 screen you would expect to be much more present in developing countries (those places the WB claims to try to help)?

About half of my netbook screen is filled up by the fixed WB header (does not scroll). The footer and article header, that are fixed too, take up another 20% of the screen height. For the actual data graphic, there is about 30% of the screen height left, and the graphic legend uses 29.9% of it.

The actual data is not readable. Thanks, WB! Way to go.

[Rant: Stop using fixed unless there is a really really really good reason for it! (Can you hear me Google? New Gmail interface hint hint)...]