Hacker News Reader

Comment by kingosticks | Hacker News Reader

I've looked before at these high-level things generating Verilog and I don't see what they bring that's so much better than what I can do with well-established VHDL. VHDL is rather verbose but that's nothing a bit of preprocessing/templating can't fix. Does slice offer something more here? I've looked at the readme but nothng jumps out. And I'm not even talking about vhdl-2019, which looks awesome (I can't wait to use in 2039 when it becomes supported in my tools)!

View on HN

I looked over the Silice readme yesterday, and as a seasoned HDL engineer, I didn't see anything for me but I could see it's merit as a learning tool.

On HLS in general, I was a skeptic too until I read this paper. [1] I am still more a verilog and verilog-mode [2] kinda guy but I can definitely see the benefits. For me, it's hard to look at figures 5,6,7 & 8 and not be impressed. I've actually started using Chisel [3] because of that paper.

That said, it's not all unicorns and rainbows. Unfortunately dealing with back end CAD is kinda an issue because they use verilog as an intermediate language and one basically ends up with the C++ name mangling issue. Chisel is not so bad about it, but it's not great either.

[1] https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~magyar/documents/firrtl-ic... [2] https://veripool.org/verilog-mode/help/ [3] https://github.com/schoeberl/chisel-book

Hi (author) - for me Silice brings comfort while designing, simplicity of reuse (groups+interfaces making it easy to assemble components), a syntax that is more to my taste (obviously ;) ) and ease of prototyping with the 'control-flow' FSM style and pipeline constructs. Plus the Lua pre-processor that I enjoy using. All this while staying close to Verilog and being able to inter-operate easily.

I also try to build an environment around Silice so that one can easily get started and enjoy testing things, experimenting with relatively advanced projects that are also (for several) explained in details. (The build system relies upon many great projects: yosys, nextpnr, edalize, openfpgaloader, verilator, icarus, etc.)

But this is a very subjective thing ; I absolutely understand that others may not like it or feel it is not necessary, being already expert at other tools. Also, I would never argue that one should use Silice instead of X. Take a look at the repo, checkout a few projects (I recommend 'vga_demo', 'terrain', 'ice-v', 'pipeline_sort' and, for pushing beyond reasonable, 'doomchip'). If you see something you might like, perhaps try making a simple design, see if that is a good tool for you.

>what they bring that's so much better

how do you generate recursive designs in vhdl? e.g. reduction trees?

>preprocessing/templating can't fix

so your tool (vhdl/verilog) requires using another tool (perl/tcl/python) to be productive and you think that's not a failing of the (first) tool?

> how do you generate recursive designs in vhdl? e.g. reduction trees?

>> preprocessing/templating

> so your tool (vhdl/verilog) requires using another tool (perl/tcl/python) to be productive and you think that's not a failing of the (first) tool?

In my opinion yes it does, and yes that is a failing. But what I was saying is, that alone is not worth the large cost of moving to something new. I was asking if Slice could offer anything more to justify that large cost.

> how do you generate recursive designs in vhdl?

I understand mapping a recursive algorithm to hardware, and VHDL can definitely do that [1]. (even if it is generally a bad idea) But what is a recursive hardware design? It sounds really interesting.

[1] https://vhdlguru.blogspot.com/2010/04/recursive-functions-in...

actually this is exactly what i was talking about i.e. (as far as i understand it) this is essentially a reduction tree. i called it a recursive hardware design because it synthesizes to indeed i was unaware that you recursively call functions in vhdl. thanks!

Reply on news.ycombinator.com