> we could have ~10 trillion.
Where? Physically, where? Compressed into tiny apartments all over the planet, like sardine cans?
Where? Physically, where? Compressed into tiny apartments all over the planet, like sardine cans?
I’d only be happy with that population level if we had a lot of Arcology-style mega-buildings to give each of us enough space and parkland, but that’s rather my point: tech enables the otherwise impossible.