Hacker News Reader

> no direct reads of another team’s data store

This reminds me of how App Store used to ban game emulators interpreting ROMs downloaded from the internet, while at the same time allowing XML parsing.

Does it really matter if the interface you're talking to over the network is code written by another team, or data written by another team? I suppose implementation details are often hidden away in data stores, but does it have to be that way?

View on HN

Direct reading effectively makes the data store an API, i.e. the API you provide is SQL SELECT over multiple tables instead of HTTP GET resource.

This pretty much freezes the database schema, the team owning it can no longer change it, because they don't know how the users use it. It also limits the possibilities to provide optimizations on the data (like caching).

> Does it really matter if the interface you’re talking to over the network is code written by another team, or data written by another team?

Yes, because it means the depedencies between systems will consistently be API dependencies, not a mix of API and datastore structure dependencies, which means that the other team will only have to reduces the constraints on change.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com