I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for YC and startups. AMA
Previous threads we've done: https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=proberts.
Previous threads we've done: https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=proberts.
I am the Co-founder and CEO of an early stage start-up incorporated in Delaware. I am originally from Bangladesh and have just closed our pre-seed round of $300k from an investor in the United States.
Which of the following options would be the best for me?
1. International Entrepreneur Parole: Raised >$250k so should be eligible.
2. O1: By my understanding, I meet the following criteria:
Award- $300k USD pre-seed investment from a top investor in the United States.
Memberships- OnDeck (beondeck.com)
Critical Employment- Co-founder and CEO
Judging- Judged start-ups for investment competition in St. Louis ($50k cheques).
High Remuneration- Own 60% Equity in my start-up
3. E2: Being from a treaty country can I apply for this or would I need to invest my own money into my start-up?
Thanks for doing this.
As far as I know, the IEP structure has no clear path to permanent residency like some of the other options. Is that your understanding as well or am I missing something here?
I couldn't find a sponsoring company for H1B transfer. I know I'm out of time. But I have plan B so I'm not worrying about overstaying. Thank you!
I changed my employer last year while my spouses h4 visa was in process. Got to know last week that h4 visa was denied because it was referring to my old h1b which has become void due to switch.
Can you give some options to get uscisnprocess her visa soon. Is it possible to get other type of visas as we would like to start an online e commerce business.
I'm a permanent resident (won the Green Card lottery) and I'm currently living in the US. I'm going to marry someone who is not a US citizen this summer. When I check the regular process, it took almost 2 years to bring my future wife to the US. What is the fastest way to bring my wife to the US after the marriage?
Thanks again.
I’ve worked remotely for a small company for a number of years and am a core team member. I suspect I fit one of the definitions for an L1 visa except that the US company doesn’t have a presence in Canada other than my home office. Would this qualify? Or does there need to be a legitimate Canadian subsidiary to even be considered?
I suppose my last option would be H1-B but that seems like the least favourable.
I had a friend who realized that the lawyers didn't really have tooling that was perfectly sized.
Thank you for putting time and effort in this.
Once there, aim for a transfer to HQ or US-based office via the L1 visa (higher likelihood than other US employment visas). From there, with a UK passport you will have a much shorter/non-existent queue to apply for and be granted a green card (within 2-4 years of L1). From there, you have full employment (or non-employment!) flexibility within the US.
The whole timeline should be about 4-8 years from getting your UK-based US-company job, which isn't short or quick, but far more reliable than many other options.
If speed is the priority, you have to take some risks.
- You can shoot to get an H1B but it's the biggest lottery shitshow. Large employers are generally unwilling to spend much effort on this these days, they may try once and then rescind the offer if the application fails.
- You can try to start a business, raise US investment, and then qualify for IEP (see other thread here)
- You can find a US-based cofounder(s), start a US-based business, and then try (probably multiple times) to file an H1B for yourself as an employee of your business. You must hold less than some % of the business to be above board.
- Above, but try for an O1 instead of a H1. Lower chances, but more flexibility once you get it. Green card is an option immediately.
- You can be an impressive individual by filling the criteria and apply for an O1.
Wondering what your take is on EB5 via loans. My understanding is that you effectively just pay the interest? Are USCIS approved investment schemes that invite folks to invest, a lot of times in property in like random american towns super shady? https://www.eb5daily.com/2018/02/eb-5-loan-work/
Also, what do you think about pursuing a PhD to be able to work on my startup and eventually getting a O1 visa and green card via the PhD. How does this compare to getting funded and applying for O1? Whats also the numbers for how many YC immigrants get an O1?
We're a US startup. One of our developers is an 18-year-old (!!) Brazilian. He wants to forego college and move to the US to work with us full-time. We're brainstorming his future possible paths to the US.
Ideas on class of visas for someone without a college degree?
One idea is the O class. He has two gold medals and one silver medal in the Brazil National Mathematics Olympiads. Unsure if these recent accolades in mathematics are sufficient evidence of "extraordinary ability" in the related field of programming?
Thanks! A
Is there any reason not to file concurrently? I'm surprised my employer is giving me the choice because I can't think of a good reason to file separately given that I have no upcoming travel plans.
I'm curious what types of things a regular tech employee could do while employed to demonstrate that they'd meet these criteria.
Background: I am from Romania (part of EU), currently working in United Kingdom. The plan is to get an L1 from a big tech co (currently working at Facebook). But I'd be very happy to find out startups sponsor H1Bs as well.
Not wanting a greencard whatsoever, just a temporary working visa, something that lets me travel tbh. I've travelled (pre covid) previously with a J1 visa, and have a couple of friends who usually do H2B but for ski retail industry, and I don't know if any of those would fit my situation right now.
Also, Embassy down here is closed so I can't do my tourism visa (B1/B2) for travelling, and I'd love to get down there this summer.
Is there any way I could get a visa for travelling ? I'd really appreciate a reply.
Thanks!
Thank you for doing this. I asked this question earlier but missed seeing your reply so I’ll state it again.
Can someone who has some unused time on H1B from long time ago, use it if they have a job offer from a US tech company and is presently outside the US?
It’s been 11 years since last present in US and the visa was approved a year earlier I believe.
Thank you.
I was definitely wishing to avoid the lottery but I guess it’s on case to case basis.
Taking a look at the IEPP webpage, I saw some vagueness that is common when looking at entrepreneurship visa programs in the US and elsewhere, for example:
"The start-up entity has received a significant investment of capital from certain qualified U.S. investors with established records of successful investments;"
In this context, what is "significant investment?" 100K? 1M? 10M?
In this context, what is a "qualified investor?" Any accredited investor? Do VCs apply to some government entity to become qualified investors in this program?
I am not personally affected by these definitions ... I am a US citizen ... but many friends of mine are foreign nationals in the US on various visas so I try to maintain a decent working knowledge of immigration options and vague language like this makes developing this understanding more difficult.
Substantial Investment is $250K of funding or $100K of grants (Just YC funding would not be enough to qualify on funding)
The qualified investor must be a US person or entity who regularly makes this type of investment, has invested $600K in the past 5 years, and their investments have created 5 qualified jobs in the US. So it looks like most VCs and some larger angels would qualify.
Edit: source: https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/forms/i-9...
On a semi related note - what’s the actual definition of “equivalent to a 4 years US bachelors degree”? I have a 3 year B.Sc from an accredited Australian uni. Would that count against me in any way?
Thanks for opening this thread!
For my visa, my employers' lawyer paid an accredited firm to examine my transcript, confirm it was equivalent to a 4 year US bachelors, and put that in a letter which was part of my application. Interview was at the consulate in Australia, no problems.
Later in life when I was working in the US and applied for a green card, my employers' (junior) lawyers took the view that the 3-year wouldn't suffice - the rules are either different, or being differently interpreted by a separate arm of the US government.
I had 5+ years of relevant work experience before my current company/role, which is considered just as good for the green card process, so we relied on that. Because that was a clearcut option, I didn't fully explore whether good lawyering could make the 3-year degree, and/or my several years of experience for my current employer in an evolving role, work.
Your lawyer should be able to find the right certifier. e.g. https://www.naces.org
What’s a good resource to learn about what that even requires, costs, and feasibility at our size?
Thanks for volunteering your time!
With regards to the O-1 Visa, my understanding is that it's an art more than a science.
As a master of this art could you please provide resources on the O-1 visa and what are the must have?
Eg. Number of newspaper articles mentioning the founder and relevance of the publication?
Is that invalidated because the assumption is that I provided it during the interview vs. them doing third party verification and getting to my publication independently?
If that's the case is it better to have 2 separate articles, one mentioning the publication and the other being the interview?
I've had two US employers now and both have promised to bring me down and then backed off because of costs (I'll be covering relocation).
I've represented myself twice and it was a smooth process.
Peter, thanks for doing this!
What are your thoughts about what computing can do to positively affect the practice and integration of law into individuals and companies?
I know the legal space has always been a tough nut for software to crack. What is your opinion on why this is?
These are very general questions and I appreciate anything you can do to help me understand this space better.
For context, I’ve built software that helped to construct sections of disclaimers/disclosures from business logic. A very primitive approach and one that doesn’t really go deep, but I felt it had potential.
Also, what about working for some months on USA and other months on Mexico? Does the visa allow this scenario or are there chances the custom agent get more inquisitive about these frequent trips?
Thank you so much for doing this. Much love ♥
From your understanding, do you think it would be possible for an international student in the U.S. on a F1 visa to apply for IEP and work on their start-up while doing school?
Thanks.
Additionally, your thoughts on the likelihood of TITLE III — REFORM OF THE IMMIGRANT VISA SYSTEM passing would be greatly appreciated. I am finishing up my PhD in STEM and that piece of legislation would make the immigration process for us infinitely easier.
> their stay in the United States would provide a significant public benefit through their business venture and that they merit a favorable exercise of discretion
Can you unpack this and explain what this means and how one can establish that this is the case?
[0] https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/humanitarian-parole/inter...
Thanks for your AMA. I work for a startup and am planning to file EB1C. Here's my situation 1. I am currently manager at the startup in Canada. I will complete one year as a manager in June 2022. I will complete one year in Canada in Oct 2021. 2. My startup has an office in USA too
Here are my questions 1. Do I need to file L1A before EB1C? Can I file EB1C directly from Canada? 2. Do I need one year "managerial" experience outside of USA to be considered for EB1C/L1A?
Thanks CD
Thanks for your AMA. I work for one of the big tech and I am a European citizen. We just sent my I-485 forms to USCIS(I-140 approved in pp). According to USCIS, it will take anywhere from 13 to 16 months to get it approved. Per portability rules, I understand that I can switch companies to a similar job after 6 months of I485 pending. However, I have a desire to start my own business, what are my options? Would it be best to stay put until I485 is done?
With the paragraph about spouses, do they mean that the spouse would have to show merit as in able to hold a good job in the US, or work for the same business? If the spouse can not demonstrate merit are they just not allowed to work or are they not allowed to stay in the US?
Are there good reasons for Mexicans on STEM OPT who intend to get a GC to keep entering H1B lottery, instead of getting a TN visa and attempting change of status? Are there other avenues?
Thank you!
They can reevaluate your TN status at every crossing, and there are many stories of this happening to people returning from holiday when I was at microsoft. The TN is efficient to get but has its downsides.
My question is: is it possible to get a TN visa without a college degree? I need it because I need to move to the US when lock down ends.
For my specific case I have completed my college courses but my college is very slow and it still will take me around 1 year to do all the paperwork, I only have "carta de pasante" now but not the degree. Is the "carta de pasante" worth anything to get the TN Visa or only the degree?
Now can they go back to US on a J1 visa, is it possible ? Can they apply for H1b non exempt positions (those which aren't subjected to lottery) instead and if not. What would be the best course of action generally do to ensure they get some kind of working visa in US assuming they have B1/B2 visiting visa.
Thanks in advance.
See above. Perhaps edit your question to make it about the general laws?
Also if not how can they get a working visa in US ?
I also updated the above question to reflect the general gist of a situation that I would be grateful to receive some help for.
I'd appreciate it terribly!
Thanks so much for doing this important public service.
If she were to leave the US now, would she be allowed to cross the border again using her L1-B visa before 11/12/2022? Or would she need to renew her visa? Thank you
I'd like to move to the US, but I don't want my visa to be linked to my current job. I'm looking for a merit-based/skill-based visa of some sort, so that my geographic location isn't tied to any company.
Is there anything that comes to mind? Any reading to recommend?
How common is it for application processing to be outside of the published processing times? I have been waiting on an I-131 since January so that I can finally leave the country to see family while my (marital) green card is processing, but I’ve seen no movement and I’m wondering if I should be worried (it’s outside of the National Benefits Center’s posted 3-5 months). I submitted a case inquiry but have not heard back yet.
If it helps, I initially applied in October and it was rejected due to a USCIS error. It looks like one of the ways to expedite is if USCIS made an error that caused a delay?
I'm the CEO of my startup. It's based out of Canada. We're doing about $8K per month from our clients in the US (for the last 1.5 years).
I would like to move to the USA. Is the best option an E-1 visa (Treaty Traders Visa). E-2 Visa wouldn't work because I over $100K at risk in the US.
Would you recommend I search out for legal council and have them take care of the paperwork or is it straight forward enough where I can do it myself?
How should I handle that, especially when crossing the border? Have they relaxed the rules due to corona?
Quick question: what if my start-up focus on psychedelic research [1]? Will I run into problem with immigration? (Considering that substances like psilocybin is still schedule one)
Or what if my start-up is not about psychedelics but I have written & published books/papers on psychedelic? What about just blog posts?
[1] say similar to ATAI (founded in 2018) that went ipo yesterday
Another example, I know cases where you cannot run your service on AWS because the customers have a blanket ban on AWS - for competitive reasons.
I'm currently looking at expediting my EAD (spousal) by means of a job offer. I've done a good amount of research, but would love to know if you've seen anything improve the odds of EAD expedite.
Have a great weekend!
I had my PERM and I-140 approved in 2017 but haven't filed my I-485 yet. Visa (H1B) and sponsoring employer are still the same as on the the I-140. Priority date on I-140 is in 2017.
I am about to file I-485. Is there any issue that may arise during I-485 processing from the delay between I-140 and I-485?
Thanks so much
Shameless plug: Contact info@tidalmigrations.com to discuss options.
What would be the best visa for a PhD holder (got PhD from a US institution) living in US who wants to start a startup? The person is currently in H-1B with an employer and his green card under EB2-NIW is under process.
what restrictions common tech worker visa types (H1B, L1B) place on employee location in the US? Specifically, do they allow remote work (office location in state A, visa worker working remotely in state B)?
I am a Canadian citizen with a diploma in Computer Programming and 3 years of experience as a Programmer Analyst. Will I be eligible to get a TN Visa to work in the US as Software Engineer?
On the plus side, this does mean that hiring a remote worker based in a foreign country can be solved with "just money", which is not true of U.S. immigration. If you want the problems to go away, you pay a staffing company 1.4x the compensation you want to pay the person, and the staffing company makes it happen.
I wonder what is your recent experience on SaaS businesses and tax liability? With recent changes across the globe, SaaS companies are responsible for emitting sales taxes in the country of the customer.
Do early-stage startups try to handle this on their own (using specialized accountants) and services like TaxJar, or do you see a movement to use Merchant of Record providers, who handle all taxation on the SaaS' behalf (like paddle.com)?
What are the potential liabilities for neglecting these issues for too long?
If the S386 bill passes. Can I apply change of status 2 years after my I-140 approval date? Even if I no longer work with the company that sponsored my I-140.
Thank you.
Thank you
What's the straightest path to the US for a tech worker?
D you happen to know how long the processing time for IEPP might be?
Do NATO agreements give some sort of visa?
Thank you for taking time to do this.
Can I get a gun on O1 visa while working in SF?
Thank you!
I had extensive immigration experience in US, where I did many filings. Worked with many different immigration lawyers.
In that end with your immigration you are dealing less with the law aspects and more with the paperwork filling which is more clerical work.
Things that I realized:
There are three types of lawyers:
1. With big firms like Berry Appleman, Fragomen etc. Very conservative in their opinion. Will not be responsive. Have good portals to enter information to help with your application.
2. Single lawyer operation like Peter Roberts: Very aggressive. Will give advice not really inline with the law. Very disorganized so you will spend a lot of time filling documents. Will make many mistakes.
3. 4-5 lawyer firms: These are the best in my opinion. They will pay more attention, have more experience and have decent process.
Issues with immigration filings:
When things are clear and you keep getting approved - things are great.
However as soon as things get complicated and you get rejections - now it will have negative impact not only on your future filings in US but also other countries. Many countries ask in their immigration application if you ever get rejected in any Visa application. Five Eye countries share all the non immigration paperwork with each other.
Issues with Peter:
He was a mix of Snake oil salesman and Fly by night operator.
He would consistently give advice which was very hackish. That works when you are trying out ideas for your business, but can have major consequences when you are dealing with the government. His advice was not in the letter and spirit of the law. He completely messed up my otherwise stellar immigration situation. I later checked his advice with multiple immigration lawyers and every single one of them said that Peter was wrong!
But the worst thing was that as soon as my application was rejected, he stopped all communications with me. He wouldn't reply to my email and stopped returning my calls. I had to find some other lawyer to clear the mess. It hurt a lot more, because I was in a very vulnerable situation in my personal life and Peter knew that!
I also know others who have bad experience with him. People probably don't speak out due to fear and not wanting to rock the boat!
My advice to all founders: Be careful when you deal with immigration filings. Find someone competent and professional!
Speaking specifically: Peter handled my personal case with consummate professionalism and effectiveness, and I've heard many YC startups speak highly of what he's been able to do for them. YC has a long track record of helping non-US startups extremely effectively with their immigration challenges, and Peter has been a big part of that for something like 6 or 7 years. Given that track record, your story sounds particularly one-sided to me, although certainly no one bats 100 and I'm sorry that you had a negative experience.
I find it hard to believe that he would "give advice not really inline with the law"—that's a charge of professional misconduct and would be a bombshell if true. Internet comments, on the other hand, are cheap and make it easy to gunsling. Readers love drama and everyone loves an underdog, which is a vulnerability routinely exploited by disgruntled commenters. It's not easy for the other side to defend themselves (let alone answer name-calling like "snake-oil salesman"); and it's basically impossible for anybody else to tell what actually happened. You describe your immigration situation as "stellar"; whether an objective observer would agree with that is something the rest of us can only be agnostic about.
I just want to use this opportunity to let fellow entrepreneurs realize the importance of picking the right immigration legal help and to not letting things get messed up on the government front
Many people on this thread are thinking of getting some kind of immigration status in US but either are outside US or are within US on H1/L1.
In hindsight I wish I had never applied for a US Green Card. My immigration situation has complications largely because Peter's bad advice.
The worst part was when he stopped responding as soon as he realized that he has screwed up my situation beyond repair. I was in a particular vulnerable situation on the personal front at that time, so it made it even worse.
If you look at my past threads, I am in a much better situation now. As I said, my sole reason of these posts is to help others not get into a bad situation like I did.
The significant word in your comment (besides "weasel", which was a good one) is "seem". These perceptions are notoriously, hopelessly, even absolutely conditioned by the political passions of the perceiver. It's quite remarkable; I would not have believed that any social phenomenon could be so mechanically consistent as this one turns out to be.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26148870
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
I will say that some of your characterizations are accurate, and others are not. I've not worked with Peter before so I won't comment on him specifically, but your assertions about law vs. clerical work is spot on. I will add my own input as well.
Immigration attorneys in the US are similar to hacking groups, minus the illegality. Good hackers have their own 0day exploits. Good attorneys have their own techniques for obtaining legal status in the US. Dealing with USCIS/ICE/EOIR/State is akin to bureaucratic hacking. Anticipating what the Government agencies want to see and hear in your petition is their exploit. Finding the appropriate supplementary evidence is their payload.
I don't think your assertion of solo attys vs medium sized firms is accurate. In my experience, solo immigration attorneys focus on the easy to win cases (like K-1 visas and AOS). This segment of the market is diminishing because of the fact that it _is_ mostly clerical work.
Likewise, the big firms are simply too big and expensive to want to approach one-off cases. They deal with the FAANGs and Fortune 500 companies.
For those reading this, consider that everyone has exceptionally complex circumstances that surround their immigration status and legal options here in the US. Obviously Peter cannot comment on it and OP has not shared that much information.
If it was a simple H1 application I think most solo practitioners would be fine.
I stand by my comment that you are better off with a mid size (4-10 lawyers) firm for more complicated cases.
Bigger firms are too bureaucratic and they want to make money with bulk H1 and L1 from bigger corps.
Single lawyer setups don't have strong processes and enough variety of expertise. Given that they are solo practitioners, there will be less checks and balances if the sole owner is giving bad or illegal advice.
In a 4-5 lawyer setup, everyone's skin is in the game. They are less likely to sell you snake oil.
In my case money was not an issue. Unfortunately I ended up choosing Peter because of YC's credibility ( he said that he is a YC advisor and their sole recommendation for immigration lawyers).
Many people here might wrongly believe that Peter is somehow a part of YC. So felt it might be a good idea to post my experience here!
Unfortunately this is very true of many other areas of the government. Reading through all of the paperwork and possessing all of the practical skills was insufficient for me to get approval to build a cabin. I couldn't figure out how to get anything past them. A couple of well-connected friends chimed in and boom - I got my permit.
Most of the immigration process is simple paperwork as far as I can tell. Certainly simpler than filing US taxes. But as you note it is all in the details, and a good lawyer will know how to ensure applications are successful (and will tell you if you are unlikely to be successful).
Wow that seems like an extraordinarily strong and serious professional accusation to make.
That's what I'm referring to. What did you think I was referring to?
> Did you read the post to the end?
Please don't accuse people of not reading things.
Majority of lawyers really dont care. They run a caging operation. If you call their office and you are not client, you will speak with head of the food chain, many times owner himself. One you get signed in, bye bye! Thats usually last time you hear from him/her - from now on you dealing with assistants. And immigration laws not only change often, but the USCIS will not comply with their own laws on many occasion. I dealt with enough government on average to tell you Immigration is sort of different because they serve aliens that have less rights than US citizens. For example IRS will treat you more seriously because on average 99% of their “clients” are USC, capable of calling their representative and stirring the pot. Average USCIS “client” is usally less powerful foreign citizen with maybe $500 savings. I was lucky to immigrate with nice saving cushion and took USCIS all the way to BIA (Board of Immigration) and basically embarrassed the whole local USCIS office, where BIA wrote completely shredding response, pointing out USCIS abuse of authority, lack of professionalism, and outright rudeness. In fact, even though my lawyer screw up so bad that there was no choice than actually start all over (with less chances of approval since now I have this spoiled milk spilled all over my alien number), the BIA went out of their way and told local office you will do X,Y,Z and if no issues arise you will approve this file. Something that's typically unheard of. Dealing with USCIS for 12 years to the cost of close to $100,000 I probably should have wrote a book by now. But its much worse than you can imagine, I can tell you this much.
Bottom line: get yourself local lawyer, small office type lawyer, preferably that worked in gov before. Believe me or not, when it comes to USCIS, its all about who you know. My last screwup was trying to get an update on the file (typical stalling technique is for USCIS to neither approve you nor deny, so you are in limbo for as long as YOU have the guts, time, energy AND money to continue "harassing" them for what's your right per INA) for close to two years.. meanwhile I went to this lawyer that used to work for the immigration office himself, and during our 30 minute call, he already emailed his buddy at USCIS and got back the ANSWER other lawyers couldn't get for years (!!).
Do I want to help fellow entrepreneurs avoid negative immigration consequences? Yes
Do I want Peter to lose his law license or get sanctioned? No. Even though I have specific proof which could get him at least sanctioned.
Do I care whether more or less business goes to Peter? Also no
His actions turned my life upside down. It took me years to fix things. Abandoning me after rejection was worse. He talked to me the day before rejection in a very positive discussion. After the rejection he didn't reply to any email nor returned any call. His paralegal kept responding to me.
I am not trying to be vindictive here.
I am just trying to help fellow entrepreneurs. I went with Peter based on his AMA. It ended up being a huge mistake in my case. Hope others can use my experience as a data point to do further due diligence!
In my immigration journey, I worked with 8 different law firms for various applications, including big ones like Berry Appleman, Fragomen. So I have good experience dealing with lawyers across the spectrum.
If you have a straight forward case, almost any competent lawyer can do a good job. Maybe even Peter might work out for you. For a simple case, I would recommend working with a well recommended local lawyer. Because there are quite a few filings which need wet signature. It will logistically save you time, money and headache of not needing to Fedex things again and again.
If you have a complicated case, I would stay away from solo practitioners and instead choose a mid size firm.
A good place to start looking for good firms is US News national ranking for Immigration lawyers: https://bestlawfirms.usnews.com/search.aspx?practice_area_id...
Out of all the firms that I worked with, I liked Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP (https://wolfsdorf.com/) best. They are also Tier 1 in US News ranking. Though they have grown in size since I worked with them.
Talk to multiple firms, do your own due diligence. If someone isn't responding well and doesn't appreciate your business, while you are evaluating firms, it will be much worse after you have signed up!
There’s a highly trained and qualified professional willing to take six hours out of their Saturday to help, for free. You chose this time to be an asshole.
There are two sides to every story but at this point, if you told me the sky was blue, I’d ask for a citation.
Edit - Hey Peter, these AMAs always help me one hell of a lot. You’re loved. I hope you hear that constantly.
I had the misfortune of using a bad immigration lawyer (along with a group of colleagues) to do a company sponsored Green Card application. The lawyer wasted 2 years through incorrect paperwork and poor communication before we fired them and restarted from scratch with different (and great) lawyer. When you are working on a 6 year H1B visa the clock is constantly ticking to get Green Card paperwork correctly filed and through the system.
I have no comment on Peter's professional abilities or how he runs his company, but calling someone who had a bad experience an a*hole is very harsh. The poster took the time to issue a warning based on their personal experience, immigration issues can totally derail someones life so having the right lawyer is critical.
You see, there are things called Law Societies or Bar Associations that are built to accept and investigate these types of complaints. That's the nature of regulated professions - there are places to complain and investigate. They take complaints like this very seriously and investigate them with almost unlimited power.
Public attacks like this are a sign that either the commenter doesn't have a clue how to deal with problems like this in a more professional way. Or the commenter does know, failed to make a case and has an axe to grind.
My post has two parts. First part was tips related to choosing a firm and knowing what is at stake if things go wrong.
Second part specifically about my experience with Peter. It's an anecdote on internet. Take it for what you might.
I agree that I started the name calling for Peter which was the best characterization of my personal experience with him. You name called me where you had no idea about what really happened with me and how Peter actions completely turned my life upside down. Might be good to reflect on your own actions!