Now, despite the big changes of C++11 as the watershed it has slowed and is doing better for it. Correlated? Maybe. Good taste should also slow the rate of change of "What do I have to deal with as a programmer in this language?" Also if the original language design that people found good enough to use was done really well then it shouldn't need too much change on top of it?
Point taken, you can use C++ as an example for anything. Even opposing points. It really has it all! (Like it or not)
Not many languages take C's ultra-high-inertia approach. Perhaps Scheme and Forth.
Most people using it will probably also claim it is a feature rather than a handicap.
Reminder that Ada already had modules (Packages) almost a decade ago.
I don't know Ada as well as I know C and C++, but I believe Ada lands somewhere between C and C++ in terms of how fast-moving it is. Makes sense that Ada is pretty slow moving, given its purpose.
> too much feature churn
Pick one, please.