Restaurants May Finally Get Relief from Grubhub and Uber’s Automatic Sign-Ups | Hacker News Reader

Restaurants May Finally Get Relief from Grubhub and Uber’s Automatic Sign-Ups

curbed.com

27 pointsryan_j_naughton18 comments

Open articleView on HN

SV has some of the best (by strict definition of a capitalist) and most ruthless capitalist the world has ever seen.

It’s amazing and baffling that the general public still views sv as progressive.

Seems like bad law. They should enforce trademark law and health&safety law, not ban a consensual service.

move fast, break things

Where “things” in this case is the restaurants you’re delivering for.

Is Google still prioritizing links to whichever delivery service they have a deal with over actual restaurant sites? I seem to remember they were doing that.

GrubHub, Doordash, Ubereats etc are unnecessary middle men. What's their actual value to the consumer? An organized list of local menus.

They, as you say, organize a list of local menus.

They centralize ordering.

They save payment information.

They broker disputes.

They offer delivery.

They are super value-adding as middlemen go.

If they are not value adding, then there should be local competition springing up that's cheaper.

In point of fact, I have added some random similar apps that turned out to be local alternatives (other end of the country from SV) and I presume the smarter restaurants are paying them less.

If they are not value adding, the alternative is "do nothing" not "launch a competitor".

Why would a business that destroys value preclude competitors that don't?

> They are super value-adding as middlemen go.

If they are so "super value-adding" as you claim then why exactly do they have a need to sign up restaurants without even asking those restaurants?

It may be value adding for those companies, but reading all those complaints from restaurateurs there seems to be very little value add for them.

Especially if they're not even asked to be listed.

Nobody asked to be listed on Google in the early days.

They're adding value to me, the end user, not necessarily to the restaurant in question.

When I say 'value adding', I don't mean that everyone is happy with their business practices, just that they are actually doing something.

> They are super value-adding as middlemen go.

I think this might be a generational/personality thing. Many younger people seem to like all this. I prefer just talking to someone at the restaurant itself. For me human interaction will always be better than some computer interface.

(I say this as a 36 year old so I'm not a dinosaur, but in this instance I feel like I'm part of the older breed.)

How did you find the restaurant? Do they take CC numbers over the phone? In which case, how much do you trust them to keep it safe?

Do they even have delivery services? because most of my favourite restaurants never did until deliveroo/Just Eat came along. think about it, AFAIK you couldn't get KFC or McDonalds delivered in the UK, now they're the biggest players in food delivery. It was really only pizza that people expected to have delivery. So if a big chain like KFC can't manage to do deliveries on their own, how do you expect "Aunt Jessie's diner" to do it?

I found the restaurant using the internet usually and then I called. And no I never tended to give my credit card because basically everyone would take payment on delivery. Though honestly I almost always pick up the food myself and almost never use delivery. This I still do today and basically no one asks for payment ahead of time so the whole credit card thing is entirely a moot point.

Now if you specifically want to use delivery services for restaurants that don't want to run their own delivery services, then yeah I guess you'll need a third-party. I tend to pick up so that's never an issue for me, but sure then use these other services.

Anyway none of this is really that important to my main point that I enjoy talking directly to the restaurants. Doing it my way might mean losing certain conveniences like delivery from any restaurant. I'm fine with that. I'd rather speak to a human anyway.

I prefer just talking to someone at the restaurant itself.

In my experience non-trivial orders given over the phone tend get screwed up more often than the same order via an app.

But as others have mentioned the big win is getting deliveries from places than don't do deliveries. If I want take away pizza from my (second) favorite pizza place, my options are drive down and pick it up my self or ordering via a third party middleman.

I personally order from restaurants I would have not bothered to research, call, pay (sometimes via phone by giving cc number, ugh), and order all the time via Uber Eats.

- discovery. How do I discover new places I might want to try without them? dozens of flyers in the mail every week?

- delivery services. not every place can retain a fleet of delivery people. Also, pooling delivery drivers is much more efficient for everyone.

- security. Local restaurant websites are always shady as hell, using some outdated wordPress plugins to do their order management, I always feel worried entering my CC number on those sites.

These companies do provide a value, even if they treat everyone involved in the worst way possible, but there's a reason why they've taken over the market.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com