I'm not sure that spinning that as a positive is a good idea. It's objectively a massive amount.
I argued that the old pipe wrench is so effective that after a practical example the threat of the old pipe wrench is enough to break any cryptography whose key is known by a pipe-wrenchable individual.
At that point, the individual needs his/her own pipe wrench.
And it is usually a good idea to aggregate with trusted others to pool resources and get a bigger, stronger pipe wrench.
Which is the military.
I did not get a response other than that my reasoning is flawed and oversimplifies the issue. Which, tbh, it definitely does