Hacker News Reader

Hacker News

Comment by ed25519FUUU | Hacker News Reader

Full thread

ed25519FUUU

Here's a list of questions I really want to know about the CIA, which I've come to deeply distrust since the 2000s.

1. What is the CIA involvement in mainstream US media? How and why do they shape American perspective via the news?[1]

2. Why are so many (former? current?) CIA agents running for congress?[2]

3. To what extent and purpose is the CIA spying domestically on American citizens and the US congress?[3]

4. What was the true purpose of "fusion cells", where the CIA was partnered with the FBI for local law enforcement?[4]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird

[2] https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/daily-2...

[3] https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/12/a-brief...

[4] https://twitter.com/fool_nelson/status/1305599303906406402?l...

View on HN

David McGowan suggests that a lot of the pop/drug culture of the late 60s was driven by the CIA as an attempt to subvert the anti-war movement.

https://www.amazon.com/Weird-Scenes-Inside-Canyon-Laurel/dp/...

I don’t think is anywhere near conclusive, but it’s definitely plausible given the information he lays out.

Fun fact: Jim Morrison’s dad literally started the Vietnam War when he led the fleet that fabricated the Gulf of Tonkin Incident:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident

The CIA didn't mastermind the Vietnam war. That would have been politicians.

I don’t think the suggestion is that the CIA masterminded the war, it’s that they were employed to squash dissent against the war/test out what they learned with Operation Paperclip and Mk Ultra.

> Jim Morrison’s dad literally started the Vietnam War when he led the fleet that fabricated the Gulf of Tonkin Incident:

No, he didn't, because the Vietnam War (the US involvement, which itself arguably was merely a continuation of the French colonial conflict) started long before the Gulf of Tonkin incident.

The Gulf of Tonkin Incident was directly used by LBJ to start the war. The act of Congress was called The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_Resolution

Yes, there’s a lot of events that led to this, but this is the act that started the war, and it was completely fabricated.

> The Gulf of Tonkin Incident was directly used by LBJ to start the war.

The US had been fighting the war since 1954.

> The act of Congress was called The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution:

Acts of Congress may authorize or declare wars, but they only start wars if the armed conflict isn’t already underway when Congress acts.

The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution didn't start the Vietnam War (or US involvement in that war), much as the “Joint Resolution Declaring that a state of war exists between the Imperial Government of Japan and the Government and the people of the United States and making provisions to prosecute the same” of December 8, 1941, didn’t start WWII, or US involvement therein (though the latter was closer in time to the start of US involvement in WWII than the former was to the start of US involvement in the Vietnam War.)

The military exercises Morrison was executing were obviously also pre-war. This was the official start of the war.

Then there's the other big McGowan thesis, which is that the Phoenix Program was imported to the US to terrorize the domestic populace into dissociation and submission, an effort whose fingerprints can be seen in the sudden rise of serial killings in the 1960s: https://www.amazon.com/Programmed-Kill-Politics-Serial-Murde...

The involvement in fictional media is pretty out in the open at this point.

Here's John Krasinski, star of Amazon's Jack Ryan series, talking about how he was welcomed at the CIA and "we should thank them every day": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9Yg6y6bFeM

A good article on how the writers for Homeland closely collaborated with representatives from the US intelligence community: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-features/home...

Art for one: Pollock, de Kooning and others (unwittingly) supported by the CIA.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/modern-art-was-cia-...

The National Endowment for Democracy is the official media influence stuff, which funds NPR domestically, and only really goes wild abroad.

The biggest and most obvious way the CIA impacts media is through leaks to journalists, though.

What are the aims of the CIA? Are all the divisions within the CIA rowing in the same direction? Is it possible there are multiple CIA operations in direct conflict with each other, without any awareness of the others' involvement? What are CIA strategy sessions like? How far out are they planning, or do they tend to be weirdly reactionary?

I’ve also wondered just how independent the CIA is from the rest of the state. Surely, they don’t seem to face any consequences when they are caught doing something bad, even to US citizens. Is it possible they have any sort of rouge work or do much work not on behalf of the US.

Actually it's a pretty open secret that the CIA, and SOCOM are heavily involved in the drug trade that they use to fund other black ops.

The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia has a great, exhaustive overview of the earlier iteration of that. Drug money is very attractive for intelligence agencies/militaries- it's free and off the books.

Possible answer to question 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird

Reply on news.ycombinator.com