Can you substantiate these (seemingly bizarre) claims of money laundering?
It sounds more like decisions are being made based on politics, presumably with an eye to the long-term improvement and viability of Qwant.
It's not just "poor use of public funds", but illegal use of public funds. For example when a public institution picks a supplier in an illegal manner (i.e. picking a friend instead of respecting the process for a public contract, or using public funds for personal benefits).