Bentley Railbike (2000)
rrbike.freeservers.com
rrbike.freeservers.com
If you’re in Skåne I can recommend Romeleåsens Dressincykling: https://www.dressincykling.se/english/
Speaking from experience having worked on locomotive engines in the past, the sheer magnitude of US rail is difficult to comprehend. a fully loaded freight train can weigh north of 20,000 tons (18.14 million kilos). They can often times be nearly 2 (3.2km) miles long. and heres the reason "rail bikes" are illegal in the US:
they can take more than a mile (1.6km) to stop.
https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme...
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sor...
And thanks for going above and beyond.
I've restored your recent comments which are fine for HN but I don't want to unban you without renaming the account because then I'll forget that we still need to do that.
I would surprised if rail bikes are allowed on any ’live’ track anywhere in the EU.
https://youtu.be/M9O1h_PtAo8?t=89 - in this specific case that is the only transportation connecting a remote (20 miles) village with a town where minimal services are available.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lüttmoorsiel-Nordstrandischmoo...
http://rrbike.freeservers.com/Railbikes_and_Railbiking_Pictu...
So nice that these old handmade sites are still around
Check out the Skunk Train rail bikes in Fort Bragg California. https://www.skunktrain.com/railbikes/
https://www.abc10.com/article/news/local/sacramento/railbike...
They started off at $50 per person on a two-seater railbike, but went up to $250 for the bike ride (so a 150% increase from $100 to $250, or 2.5x increase).
The explanation was along the lines of "it's what the experience costs, we started off low to gain some steam, but adjusted to actual price later". Their railbikes have electric assist systems too, and the rides are around 90 minutes.
And in some cases the available route length is quite a bit longer than the seven or fifteen miles mentioned in that article.
A webcounter! Echoes of a more fun web.
unfortunately, this particular one is closed, but there are others in the state.
ALWAYS KEEP IN MIND, you should use railbikes ONLY on ABANDONED lines!!
See also: Shweeb - https://www.nzherald.co.nz/travel/shweeb-how-new-zealands-hy...
[0] https://hemomkringvandring.se/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/IMG...
A normal bicycle can be lifted in one hand. This looks more unwieldy but not too much heavier. It shouldn't be hard.
(If two riders are both so oblivious that neither sees the other coming from at least a quarter-mile off, they deserve to crash.)
To proceed into a section of track, the train driver/guard must physically possess an object, typically handed over at a station just before the section, and returned just after.
[1] With some exceptions – the Severn Tunnel e.g. was switched to axle counters already in 1987 because track circuits proved too unreliable within the (wet) environment of the tunnel.
Aside: Paul Graham's blog that is frequently front-paged on here doesn't support HTTPS. That has always seemed odd.
http://www.open-std.org/ is the site that maintains lots of documents for the Joint Technical Committee ISO/IEC JTC 1.
Historically both ISO and the IEC worked on IT standards. But obviously it's no good if there's an ISO international standard for how to encode the letter 'A' as binary data and a separate IEC standard for how to do it. In the best case this is pointless duplication of effort (these are international standards groups, every country is ultimately involved) and in the worst case they diverge and there's actual conflict, defying the purpose of standardization. So, the Joint Technical Committee does work on this intersection on behalf of both IEC and ISO.
Now, the importance of these standards to everybody means it certainly can be argued that the site must remain forever accessible to those without HTTPS but it's hard to think of any reason to just not implement HTTPS at all...