>This is recalling the old Linus debates, but the aggressiveness _doesn't improve the clarity_, and is basically upping the word count.
It drives the point home though, and keeps the energy levels higher.
It drives the point home though, and keeps the energy levels higher.
Personally for me, concise and information-dense writing makes me sit up and pay attention.
Is the argument too weak to do that on its own without the abuse?
Arguments are seldom weak or strong based on their technical details.
Heck, the technical details about this were already known to many people including several involved in build setups, but nobody cared anyway.