Black economic gains reversed in Great Recession
finance.yahoo.com
finance.yahoo.com
Come on folks, something usable in a statistic that doesn't just make us groan.
Why not have a trickle up effect where the gov't lets people stay in their homes, and tells the banks to eat it, and folds them up because they didn't meet their capital requirements.
Why should we let real people go bankrupt and bail out fictional entities. If there is money for JP Morgan, AIG and GS there is money for the people mentioned in the article. Open up the Fed Discount Window to real people and close it to the banksters.
This helps the same number of people, but avoids the moral hazard that your scheme creates.
Sounds like "letting judges adjust the principle on mortgages" is step one to avoiding that moral hazard. Hopefully we don't have people feeling strongly enough about moral hazard that they shoot the guys who sold the "safe" investments in Mortgage backed securities.
"By 2009, the median net worth for white households had fallen 24 percent to $97,860; the median black net worth had fallen 83 percent to $2,170"
That's MEDIAN, not AVERAGE. Average is even worse, as you say drawn up by the few very wealthy. But with median, the wealth disparity is already astounding. It's a racial issue. We can debate the reasons, but the fact remains. Middle class and even lower class white households still have much more wealth on average than their black counterparts in the same income group.
There is no such thing as "money for people". Money is used to account wealth, which is created by people.
If you are producing something, you can increase production or you can increase count ("money"). You propose to increase count.