- Asking the tiny fraction of the population who are immunocompromised to remain locked down until the safety of vaccines has been empirically verified?
- Or asking healthy humans to take an experimental vaccine with no recourse should they suffer adverse effects?
When is the vaccine safe and no longer experimental, according to you? We have now given over 2 billion vaccine doses around the world.
The moral thing to do is protect idiots from their own stupidity because we value their lives still, but recently I'm questioning that.
Then why can’t I sue should I have an adverse effect?
The definition of experimental has no relation to the ability to be sued.
Being selfish and risking others?
Being kind and not holding others hostage because you don't believe in science?