>> You'll notice they say - we don't have enough data. Then data is incomplete. Then we can't really say because study was X / Y / Z.
This is a weird trend these days. Medical science refuses to take an engineering approach to anything and only accepts statements based on controlled studies. That includes rejecting previous understanding of how immunity works in general. Early on when claims were made about HCQ, Zinc, or whatever, they were shot down as "not approved treatment" even though there were no approved treatments! The utter failure to recommend vitamin D supplements is another failure - we know deficiency weakens immune response, we know most (Americans) are deficient in the winter, it's a no-brainer but in their mind it was not "proven" so not even mentioned or recommended for anyone.
The only pattern I see considering all cases like that is the underlying notion that people must not do anything for themselves.