This argument makes every single law moral. It also is telling you to not question laws that are in place. If "crime" is your definition of moral or immoral I'd love to hear your take on any of the civil rights movements of the last 100 years.
I mean one is about basic rights the government owes us, the other is about us wanting the government to take more from particular people.
The civil course is slower but the alternative is typically bloody revolutions or Hongweibings, both of which set back societies.
How do you think most of the rich stay on the good side of the law? They have much more direct access to legislators via mechanisms that should be illegal, but are not because they pay to protect them.