> For free speech to be a reasonable thing to priorise over other things you have to have some more fundamental rules of society in place. E.g. fighting for free speech during the rise of the nazi party in 1920s Germany might sound like a noble thing, but once the Nazis whos speech you defended are in power they will shoot you at your doorstep for defending that of their enemies.

Do you mean the actual summary of what happened in the US over the past 50 years ?

"These Rights were convenient at the time we were a minority, but now, we are in power, they are in the way of our ideal utopia."

> I'd rather loose the right to utter certain inflamatory phrases than loose the right and the possibility to vote the next government out of office in a fair and representative election.

And that's why the 2nd Amendment is protecting the 1st. (and all the subsequent).