>We will evaluate external factors, including [...] restrictions on peaceful assembly and other markers of civil unrest.
This was published today, when he is not in office. What restrictions could this refer to?
This was published today, when he is not in office. What restrictions could this refer to?
What will be the new factors in 2 years that aren't present now.
Current ban is based on "violated Facebook’s Community Standards and Instagram’s Community Guidelines"
I don't see what they can possibly re-assess if he isn't on their platform in the first place.
They will monitor his behavior outside of their platform and deem him worthy or not?
The location of the Overton window. Facebook is just hedging it's bets. George Bush is largely accepted by Democrats now many of whom wore F bush t-shirts a decade or so ago.
They've all been doing essentially the same thing. The only way the parties really differ is in the lies they tell to get votes.
I don't have a dog in this fight, but I'm confused by this line. Whose restrictions on whose peaceful assembly?, and why is it worded so that restrictions on peaceful assembly is included in the list of "markers of civil unrest"? If I recall correctly restrictions on assembly started in response to disease outbreak, and later were sometimes applied to some left wing and some right wing protests. What if it's an unjust restriction on a righteous protest, or an unsafe lack of restriction on a "riot"? Is either situation a marker of civil unrest? Sorry my literal mind is having trouble parsing this.