7-11 is opening 500 EV charging stations by the end of 2022
cnet.com
cnet.com
I have a plug-in hybrid (Volt) and live in an apartment complex without chargers, and I use the abundant shopping mall chargers at Valley Fair mall in San Jose, CA as you describe. I live close enough to walk home 1 mile from the mall, so I'll drop car off, then go into mall to pickup a meal at the nice food court or browse around. Probably as 7-11 hopes: I'll readily spend $10-$15 on food, while charging $5.
My unique fit here is that Valley Fair is an urban mall: it's close to my apartment in healthy walking distance, and it has dense multi-level parking structures, so I'm not walking out and back through a vast mall parking lot.
Movie theaters in malls map well to charging stations because of the 2 hour duration you are inside, for when people go inside movie theaters again ($AMC?) Offices and workplace charging work well for me too (when not WFH)
IMO it's kind of useless though. If I'm traveling I need a DC fast charger and if it is a DC fast charger, probably won't have much time to go in the mall before it's done (and have to move my car to open up the spot). If I'm near home I almost never need to charge outside.
7-11 is actually better since I won't be too far away from my car. Run in, grab a snack, chill for 5-10 minutes and be on my way. Only problem is they never have bathrooms.
Also, at a 7-11 near a freeway exit, I would assume it's a different story than an urban 7-11.
with that said, malls are also a great place to have charging.
With a couple thousand you can create a small EV charging operation. It baffles me when I see gas stations with a new car wash system that is probably expensive as fuck and not a single EV charging station in miles.
Is EV charging a regulated industry or something?
There are zillions of free-as-in-free-beer charging locations.
With the first category, I imagine they just don't want people hanging around. The dollars per car per hour ratio drops off a cliff when you have EVs just sitting there for 15-40 minutes clogging up the limited space.
Charging stations are best placed where there is something to do. That's why every casino has them.
Having more is a good thing, but gas stations adding them wont move the needle any time soon.
A friend was telling me recently that there aren't many chargers. He lives in Boulder, of all places. There are a million public chargers around Boulder, but they're relatively invisible compared to a gas station, especially if you aren't actively looking for them. When I showed him the plugshare map he couldn't believe it, he thought this stuff was a decade away.
In my experience owning five EVs, public charging isn't really an issue, especially for Tesla and J-1772. If anything, I worry for chargepoint et. al. in the face of so many free chargers in the short term.
That said, there are some weird spots between superchargers if you have a tesla. And if you rely on CCS with the coming onslaught of F-150 lightnings... I wish you good luck and to reconsider. Slow charging speed and crappily maintained CCS / CHaDeMo are really going to suck the life out of you on road trips compared to superchargers. But if you can get by with J1772 then life is good.
So the gas station model, where you want a fast charger and for it to be ubiquitous, is anything but. San Francisco has 4 non-Tesla stations with >=75 kWh, for example. And then of course there's the Tesla vs non-Tesla divide.
Installation might require increasing the local transformer station, which whoever wants the capacity has to share the cost for. This can be very expensive, usually hundreds of thousands USD from what I understand.
Also the running costs can be significant, as there's a separate grid charge based on the peak kW used per month. This can add up to a lot if multiple chargers are used simultaneously.
But you are completely right; stations that become conspicuous charging destinations are going to do a lot of convenience store business. It'd be smart of well located towns to work on making it easier to add charging infrastructure so they can continue to be popular stops.
The ones that charge a car in 30-60 minutes generally have their own dedicated transformer, the size of a fridge. Two cars can pretty easily use 300KW with older tech, 600KW+ with newer stuff. If my math is right, that's 2,500 amps on traditional 240V service. My house has 100A service for comparison.
I'm not sure how Electrify America installation works, but for Tesla they front all of these costs so all it would take to get them installed at stations is the landowner allowing it to be placed on their land (likely with some sort of revenue share agreement, if they don't think they'll get enough money from the increased foot traffic).
0: https://techcrunch.com/2013/07/26/inside-teslas-supercharger...
1: https://ark-invest.com/articles/analyst-research/supercharge....
Probably more effective for some restaurant franchise to add EV charging as part of their branded setup. E.g. Every IHOP in the country has EV charging.
Been to a few in rural areas in USA, not the greatest experience.
I was impressed when a new Denny's opened up near me in BC Canada.
Food was good and decent selection(decor looks good), but when looking at 15-20$ an entree, may aswell go somewhere a little bit better.
At the least, Sonic ought to go in on chargers
https://www.vice.com/en/article/dyv7my/building-an-electric-...
Battery integrated chargers can help with the infrastructure side:
- VW: https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/news/vw-group-components-e-on-...
- Freewire: https://freewiretech.com/products/dc-boost-charger/
- Jolt Energy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v33Dy3AKf6g
Some gas stations may have extra room and would be able to offer up some parking spots for charging, but I'd assume that for most of them it doesn't make sense.
Another consideration is that throughput is a lot higher with DC fast chargers, and those are a lot more expensive than the cheap L2 AC chargers. And they might require some significant electrical infrastructure upgrades.
It's a numbers game and it's all about throughput. You might convert x% of fuel buyers into people who buy a coffee or lotto ticket any one day. EV chargers are very low throughput so they're not very attractive. There's other better ways to improve that money widening the customer pipe or improving conversion ratio.
It's not cheap to build pumps and underground storage tanks for gas stations, so it's not as if gas station owners would be stunned by upfront costs. Lots of stations already have plenty normal parking spots that generate zero income on their own.
If anything, a longer stop would incentivize more convenience store shopping. Which would make them want to have better stock and selection, which in turn might attract nearby foot traffic. Seems like a no-brainer to me.
I dunno how many years these chargers can last, but 50kw chargers will be obsolete in 5-10 years time.
Since we will be stuck in the car for longer time, it seems like a field ripe for disruption.
Don't forget that even today, gas stations do not make their profit from selling gas, but from the convenience store.
[1]https://th.bing.com/th/id/Rd6475860948f58c4523352a0cec38645?...
Not sure if this link will show:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jefferysview/6442802819
And given the industry is pushing for a fast-charge within 5-10 minutes, which would give another 100 miles to your car, I don't see why this wouldn't work?
Is the ideal long term goal to have a charger in basically every parking spot?
For example an apartment building where every single spot in the parkade has a charger.
A couple of examples of dedicated charging locations:
- Circle K in Norway: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TVohXHjLro
- Gridserve in the UK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoN4WCpuxHY
Quality control, general standardization and ease of access would need to be solved, but if done right this could be automated by pulling up to a vending machine and maybe eventually (super futuristic) on the fly like the way they can do in-flight fueling for aircraft.
The initial overhead could be worth it to not sit around charging, but I could also see other interests winning out here (bored people spend money, standardization isn't necessarily win-win, enabling third party service is less profitable for the car makers, &c).
No consumer is ever going to agree to this psychologically, so I wish people would stop pushing it.
No one is going to agree to swap the pristine battery in their new car with a reconditioned battery (at best) at a charging stop.
Nio has done over two million battery swaps:
https://www.nio.com/blog/nio-completes-2000000-battery-swaps
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTsrDpsYHrw
Ample wants to do the same but with fleet cars at first:
They might if they never owned a battery in the first place.
I certainly am not particularly interested in owning a massive expensive wear item of almost certainly soon to be obsolete technology.
In a world with standardized batteries that are easily swappable at a dedicated facility like an EV jiffy lube, it doesn't take much imagination to see your EV delivered with one of EV jiffy lube's swaps preinstalled and all priced accordingly.
As in ideally you use swap but you can also charge if you're in a pinch.
But not for a long time, the swapping infrastructure would likely be really expensive to build, so you'd need a lot of users to make it worth it.
The electrification of highways is something I'd love to see happen, but so far I don't think there's much interest or even consideration of that as a possibility. (There are a couple pilot projects in Sweden, one using overhead lines and another that uses slots cut into the road surface with high voltage rails underneath.) The payoff would be huge though in terms of reducing the cost and carbon emissions from long-haul trucking.
Tesla switched to CCS in Europe two years ago. The European Teslas are better cars purely because they have a plug you can use with more fast chargers with no need for an adapter.
In Europe, they recently launched a ShitEV called Dacia Spring. You can buy it in Germany for around $14000 [0]. The world has enough room, and will have enough EVs in time, for regular charging stations for regular people, or even "standard hangout figures" ... we won't all be driving hype.
[0] https://www.carscoops.com/2021/03/dacia-spring-ev-prices/
Say you have to drive 1000 mi / 1600 km nonstop or have a low battery. So how are EVs going to work practically for everyone who isn't rich without standard swappable battery packs like the original Model S had?
--
There "isn't enough room" in ATX; homelessness is being recriminalized. Also, there "isn't enough room" in Denmark for out-of-EU asylum waiting camps because no one wants to host them.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/austin-s-homeless-camping-...
https://www.kctv5.com/denmark-passes-law-to-move-asylum-cent...
His reference ICE car is a Kia Ceed hybrid, which completed the run in 9h25m. The fastest EV: 9h35m - Yes, that was an expensive Audi. The fastest Tesla: Model S Long Range - 9h50m
All data found here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1V6ucyFGKWuSQzvI8lMzv...
... and the relevant videos from each test can be found on his Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/bjornnyland
At that point it becomes a nice spot to stretch your legs and grab something quick to bite before you're back on the road again.
I never charge at anything less than 75KW if I am driving long distance. I have 22KW at home for slow charging.
Do you think 7-11 is going to install very fast charging? It's 7-11: where deathdogs rotate forever until someone who doesn't like living buys one.
Affordable EVs these days, for example the ID.3 or ID.4 do 125KW charging, at least up to a certain point. Teslas are not much better. Yes, the Model 3 can charge much faster than this, but only for a short time until it will throttle down significantly.
For this reason though, charging only a little makes even more sense. Bringing your battery from 10% to 50% should be relatively fast no matter which car you have. The last 50% will take much longer.
Once the car throttles down the charging speed, you are probably better off finding another charger an hour or two away - unless you're planning a longer stay.
This is 100% true and, from recent experience, generally a much better way to road trip. Stopping every 150 miles or so breaks up the trip into nice chunks and keeps you fresh.
I took an earlier trip where I had to charge from 10-90% twice due to charger distance and it was much worse.
If you really think about it, all the EV subsidies need to go the charging infrastructure. Tesla has already proven people want EVs. The real challenge is the charging for people without houses. Right now much of DC Fast charging falls on Electrify America's hands and they really do not care at all as they are just a punishment company for VWs diesel cheating scandal. In my and a lot of other experiences, up to 25% of public chargers are broken and can take months to repair. Only Tesla has decent organization to fix it in just a couple of days. People who buy EVs now are in for a rude awakening.
The best way to think of it is five additional hundred. That's the advantage of using a common standard like CCS. Drivers of CCS cars can make use of all CCS chargers with no need for adapters.
7-Eleven's 250 new charging locations will be added to the existing 4,414 CCS locations in the US and Canada:
https://insideevs.com/news/507489/tesla-model3-charging-fast...
https://support.fastned.nl/hc/en-gb/articles/360012178313-Ch...
Called the regional HQ, told the guy there the story, and he just hung up on me and wouldn't answer when I called back.
Since then I've been avoiding 7-11 because, as far as I can tell, it's run by a-holes. They've lost more business from me than they would have spent on just refunding my $30 gas purchase or whatever.
Makes me think twice about plugging a $50-$100k car in to their business though. :-)