The long, strange life of the naked mole rat
wired.com
wired.com
Having few natural predators seems to a commonality with exceptionally long-lives species.
This made me wonder, do naked mole-rats have lower genetic diversity than other mammals? Turns out they do https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1...
Seems to me it's likely that the more natural predators a species has, the more evolutionary pressure it has to increase genetic diversity. One of the ways to increase genetic diversity is to turn up the rate of aging, so you don't get some long lived individuals that keeps having children for ages.
On the flip-side, with few natural predators, genetic diversity isn't as important and the rate of aging can be turned down.
The documentary is really about genius and goes into how the specialist is so into mole rats. I wish I was into anything as much as that guy is into mole rats.
Sharks are the other good choice. Cold water isn't attractive but 150+ years. Why? I guess when you occupy the right niche, the bugs leave you alone.
I suppose most of the type I see are less glorious varieties about the size of my arm, but sharks nonetheless.
https://www.shark.ch/Database/Distribution/index.html
You're right though, warmer waters tend to have more species. I'm not able to find anything indicating actual numbers of sharks, but more species (correct me if I'm wrong) seems to indicate a larger cumulative population and more and/or more diverse prey
In another life I'd love to be a marine biologist. There's so much to know and understand better.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/how-ginkgo-biloba-ac...