> So, yes, that seems to have been a good strategy
The point though is that this was a massive gamble on Japan's part in the 1930's. They had no idea if it would actually work.
The point though is that this was a massive gamble on Japan's part in the 1930's. They had no idea if it would actually work.
On the other hand, it is worth noting that Japan’s early enthusiasm for aircraft carriers was partly driven by the terms of the Washington and London naval treaties, which limited its battleship fleet.
As for having evidence that a successful attack on Pearl Harbor could be made, its planners looked at not only the exercises described here, but also the British attack on the Italian fleet in Taranto harbor in 1940.