“There ain't no such thing as a free lunch”
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Interestingly, although TANSTAAFL can be summarized as "everything is a zero-sum game", the core tenet of modern economy is that the economy is not a zero-sum game and eternal growth is possible. So as much as TANSTAAFL has been characterized as "libertarian", it's also a refutation of libertarian narratives like "trickle-down economics" and perpetual economic growth.
Nothing about TANSTAAFL implies what you claim it does and I am quite perplexed how anyone could read this into it. Must be the ideological specs.
One example of this is hydro power. Once you build a water mill on a river you don't have to do any work to keep it going. The sun heats up the water downstream from the waterwheel and it falls down as rain upstream. The river keeps flowing whether you take advantage of it or not. Eventually the sun will stop shining, but in practice that's so far away that it doesn't matter.
I think how most people understand TANSTAAFL is that if it's free, there are always strings attached. This holds true in many situations (owing favors in return, free food being salty so you order more drinks, free trials encouraging vendor lock-in, etc). But it's not true in all situations and stretching the definition so it covers those makes it useless.