Off topic: See, this is what happens when enough people try to use a mild word for something bad they’re doing in order to try to hide the badness: other people who see this usage alter their perceived meaning of the mild word to represent what they see as prevalent usage. The mild word comes to mean the bad thing.

In this example, “sponsored”. A more accurate term in this case would have been something like “paid dishonest shill”, but the constant use of “sponsored” by paid shills (esp. on YouTube) has altered our perception of the word “sponsored”. I would not be surprised if soon many companies would like to move away from that word and not be “sponsors” anymore, and instead be “supporters”, etc.

It’s the reverse of the euphemism treadmill, really.

Can you comment on the feature they call 'vital-ion' with electro-chemical filtering?

If it's an ionizer won't it be releasing Ozone into your filtered room?

That sounds like the opposite of what you want for asthmatics, chidren, etc.

Thanks, [this](https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/best-air-purifier...) was a great read from a trustworthy source.

The AP-1512HH sounds like a great buy for most cases, although if you're particularly concerned about VOCs including exhaust fumes (we are - we live in a dense city, close to a main road), the Austin Air HealthMate HM400 is probably what you want. Used by "FEMA and the Red Cross ... for deployment at Ground Zero and the surrounding areas in the aftermath of 9/11", apparently.

Careful with that... Wirecutter is known for recommending whoever gives them the biggest commission.