I've thought of the intent as a little like using a fuzzer in security research, although that might not by a great analogy.
I've thought of the intent as a little like using a fuzzer in security research, although that might not by a great analogy.
You know, now that I just typed that out, I’m becoming more and more convinced common sense was lacking when it comes to that Wuhan Lab. Something simple most likely happened because the common sense just wasn’t there.
Edit:
Here are the articles related to lab leaks before 2015 (these articles were posted before 2015, before the conspiracy or any kind of anti-China agenda):
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/304/5671/659
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC416634/
https://nationalpost.com/news/a-brief-terrifying-history-of-...
I simply googled ‘before:2015-01-01 china lab leak’ to get this confirmation bias.
Whatever really happened, there never was a vial in that lab that said "potentially pandemic virus - handle with extreme care". Even if the virus came from (or rather through) a lab, there is no evidence what the researcher's actual intentions were. We don't even know which researchers were responsible.
If it evolved in a lab through any kind of "gain of function" research, this must have happened completely off the radar. The existing evidence just doesn't prove anything. On the contrary, the evidence that there was "gain of function research" going on with viruses that weren't nearly identical to Sars-Cov-2 makes it less likely that this virus originated from such research.