If you are genuinely curious, you might try this book [1].
On the other hand, if you were genuinely curious, you could have figured out who Vandana Shiva was.
[1]: https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780128176740/inequality-...
On the other hand, if you were genuinely curious, you could have figured out who Vandana Shiva was.
[1]: https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780128176740/inequality-...
> you could have
If someone is indulging in Appeal to Authority, it is incumbent upon them to provide a reference, not the reader.
According to who? This is not a debate class. If you are motivated to understand another you may well want to look up what they are saying. What are you adding when you reply with “never heard of her” instead of doing a quick search?
I regularly put sources in my comments but this time I was in the middle of other things.
To have claims to be taken seriously, back it up. That's expected of anyone making a claim.
In a debate, sure, the other party isn’t going to do any work to understand you unless they can use it to make you look bad.
But if two curious people are talking, either party will do work to fill in the blanks. And I’m afraid you’re treating this as a debate.